Comments on: ‘Much to Lose, Little to Gain’ with Law of the Sea Treaty http://bobmccarty.com/2007/07/07/much-to-lose-little-to-gain-with-law-of-the-sea-treaty/ Humor, Politics, Culture & Capitalism @BobMcCarty Sat, 19 May 2012 01:24:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: hotoffthepress2 http://bobmccarty.com/2007/07/07/much-to-lose-little-to-gain-with-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-2954 hotoffthepress2 Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:56:22 +0000 http://bobmccarty.com/2007/07/07/much-to-lose-little-to-gain-with-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-2954 Below is more info I received from "Informed Lawyer" on the subject of LOST: Please see the New & Improved ITSSD Journal on the UN Law of the Sea Convention (itssdjournalunclos-lost.blogspot.com) with more accurate information than Senator Biden’s recently released Senate Foreign Relations Committee Report. There are three other ITSSD Journals that provide related background information concerning what is truly lying beneath the surface of the UNCLOS: ITSSD Journal on Economic Freedom http://itssdeconomicfreedom.blogspot.com ITSSD Journal on Intellectual Property Rights http://itssdinternationaliprights.blogspot.com ITSSD Journal on Pathological Communalism http://itssdpathologicalcommunalism.blogspot.com Below is more info I received from “Informed Lawyer” on the subject of LOST:
Please see the New & Improved ITSSD Journal on the UN Law of the Sea Convention (itssdjournalunclos-lost.blogspot.com) with more accurate information than Senator Biden’s recently released Senate Foreign Relations Committee Report.

There are three other ITSSD Journals that provide related background information concerning what is truly lying beneath the surface of the UNCLOS:

ITSSD Journal on Economic Freedom http://itssdeconomicfreedom.blogspot.com

ITSSD Journal on Intellectual Property Rights http://itssdinternationaliprights.blogspot.com

ITSSD Journal on Pathological Communalism http://itssdpathologicalcommunalism.blogspot.com

]]> By: Senator Warns About Law of the Sea Treaty « Bob McCarty Writes http://bobmccarty.com/2007/07/07/much-to-lose-little-to-gain-with-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-850 Senator Warns About Law of the Sea Treaty « Bob McCarty Writes Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:20:22 +0000 http://bobmccarty.com/2007/07/07/much-to-lose-little-to-gain-with-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-850 [...] that appeared in the Washington Times yesterday and echoes the concerns I shared in a July 7 post, ‘Much to Lose, Little to Gain’ with Law of the Sea Treaty. Below is the text of his column that appeared on his Senate web site. What if I were to tell you [...] [...] that appeared in the Washington Times yesterday and echoes the concerns I shared in a July 7 post, ‘Much to Lose, Little to Gain’ with Law of the Sea Treaty. Below is the text of his column that appeared on his Senate web site. What if I were to tell you [...]

]]> By: hotoffthepress http://bobmccarty.com/2007/07/07/much-to-lose-little-to-gain-with-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-848 hotoffthepress Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:05:12 +0000 http://bobmccarty.com/2007/07/07/much-to-lose-little-to-gain-with-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-848 Informed Lawyer -- Thanks for the info. Americans need to know about this! Informed Lawyer — Thanks for the info. Americans need to know about this!

]]> By: Informed Lawyer http://bobmccarty.com/2007/07/07/much-to-lose-little-to-gain-with-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-849 Informed Lawyer Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:57:51 +0000 http://bobmccarty.com/2007/07/07/much-to-lose-little-to-gain-with-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-849 One of the most blaring omissions in the statements coming from the US military in support of the UN Law of the Sea Convention is a thorough analysis of the treaty's more than 45 environmental articles, regulations and protocols, and numerous other standards that could be used to diminish the military's right to freedom of navigation/ innocent passage. In addition, recently released reports have described how the US military will be increasing its reliance on private contractors more than 50% during the next 5-10 years. The myriad activities of private contractors designing, formulating, producing, testing, delivering and deploying technologies for military application are highly unlikely to qualify for exemption as 'military activities’ under the UNCLOS. The military brass is quite confident, at least publicly, about how they could unilaterally determine what is or is not a 'military activity' for purposes of qualifying for the treaty exemption. And, they believe that they could fit all such activities neatly under one ‘military activity’ tent. They are unlikely, however, to succeed in exempting their supply chains. Furthermore, the environmentally-obsessed EU member states have 27 votes for every 1 vote cast by the US at the UNCLOS Secretariat meetings, which the administration has been less than forthcoming in explaining. Lastly, there remains a quaint notion within US constitutional law which is commonly referred to as 'due process'. In the context of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings that are now underway, this means transparency and a thorough publicly aired review. Unfortunately, this has not yet occurred considering that a number of house and senate committees possess oversight jurisdiction which they have yet to exercise to review the various dimensions of the UNCLOS that have not been considered in light of new international environmental law developments since the previous UNCLOS hearings. The American people are entitled to know from their elected representatives how this expansive treaty which will reach into US sovereign territory (land, internal waterways and air above) and into the US regulatory and free enterprise systems, will affect American pocketbooks, small businesses and daily lives. <a href="http://www.coin.dk/default.asp?aid=1370" rel="nofollow"> The ‘LOST 45’ UN Environmental Restrictions on US Sovereignty</a> One of the most blaring omissions in the statements coming from the US military in support of the UN Law of the Sea Convention is a thorough analysis of the treaty’s more than 45 environmental articles, regulations and protocols, and numerous other standards that could be used to diminish the military’s right to freedom of navigation/ innocent passage.

In addition, recently released reports have described how the US military will be increasing its reliance on private contractors more than 50% during the next 5-10 years. The myriad activities of private contractors designing, formulating, producing, testing, delivering and deploying technologies for military application are highly unlikely to qualify for exemption as ‘military activities’ under the UNCLOS. The military brass is quite confident, at least publicly, about how they could unilaterally determine what is or is not a ‘military activity’ for purposes of qualifying for the treaty exemption. And, they believe that they could fit all such activities neatly under one ‘military activity’ tent. They are unlikely, however, to succeed in exempting their supply chains.

Furthermore, the environmentally-obsessed EU member states have 27 votes for every 1 vote cast by the US at the UNCLOS Secretariat meetings, which the administration has been less than forthcoming in explaining.

Lastly, there remains a quaint notion within US constitutional law which is commonly referred to as ‘due process’. In the context of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings that are now underway, this means transparency and a thorough publicly aired review. Unfortunately, this has not yet occurred considering that a number of house and senate committees possess oversight jurisdiction which they have yet to exercise to review the various dimensions of the UNCLOS that have not been considered in light of new international environmental law developments since the previous UNCLOS hearings. The American people are entitled to know from their elected representatives how this expansive treaty which will reach into US sovereign territory (land, internal waterways and air above) and into the US regulatory and free enterprise systems, will affect American pocketbooks, small businesses and daily lives.


The ‘LOST 45’ UN Environmental Restrictions on US Sovereignty

]]> By: NoisyRoom.net » Blog Archive » Noisy News Around the Web - 07/10/07… http://bobmccarty.com/2007/07/07/much-to-lose-little-to-gain-with-law-of-the-sea-treaty/comment-page-1/#comment-847 NoisyRoom.net » Blog Archive » Noisy News Around the Web - 07/10/07… Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:43:07 +0000 http://bobmccarty.com/2007/07/07/much-to-lose-little-to-gain-with-law-of-the-sea-treaty/#comment-847 [...] ‘Much to Lose, Little to Gain’ with Law of the Sea Treaty - Bob McCarty Writes [...] [...] ‘Much to Lose, Little to Gain’ with Law of the Sea Treaty – Bob McCarty Writes [...]

]]>