Bob McCarty Writes

Humor, Politics, Culture & Capitalism @BobMcCarty

Bob McCarty Writes header image 2

‘They’re back!’ Senator’s DREAM Act is Our Nightmare

July 17th, 2007 · 15 Comments

Illegal Immigration Alert: It’s BAAAAACK! (Cross-posted from Common Sense America.)

What do our elected officials do when they don’t get their way on the issue of amnesty for illegal aliens? They simply piecemeal the amnesty bill and try to sneak it into other bills. They think we won’t notice.

Yeah, right!

This week, The Dream Act will rear its ugly head as Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) tries to insert it into our Defense Authorization Bill. On Friday, Durbin stated:

What I tried to do several years ago was to write a law to take into consideration these young people. It is called the DREAM Act. The DREAM Act was a part of this comprehensive immigration reform bill. Here is what it says: If you came to the United States before the age of 16, if you have lived in this country for at least 5 years, if you graduate from high school, and then if you will complete either 2 years of college or 2 years of service in the military, we will give you an opportunity for legal status in America.

Durbin announced that he would be offering the Dream Act as an amendment this week:

On the floor of the Senate, when we return next week, we will resume consideration of the Defense authorization bill. It turns out that many in the Department of Defense believe, as I do, that the DREAM Act is an important part of making certain we have talented young men and women ready to serve in our military. I have spoken to people at the Department of Defense who support the idea of the DREAM Act. I think we ought to include it in the Defense authorization bill. I hope to have that opportunity. [snip]

I hope when we return to the Defense authorization bill we can make the DREAM Act part of that bill. Certainly, it is going to help our defense and help our military. I think it is going to help America even beyond that. [snip]

Mr. President, as I said, I rise to speak about legislation known as the DREAM Act, which I hope to offer as an amendment to the Defense authorization bill.

And Durbin goes on to say how much Americans need these illegal aliens – our military will crumble without them, ahem, well, at least according to Durbin:

Some people might ask why the Senate should revisit immigration again and whether an immigration amendment should be included in the Defense authorization bill. The answer is simple: The DREAM Act would address a very serious recruitment crisis that faces our military.

Under the DREAM Act, tens of thousands of well-qualified potential recruits would become eligible for military service for the first time. They are eager to serve in the Armed Forces during a time of war. And under the DREAM Act they would have a very strong incentive to enlist because it would give them a path to permanent legal status.

Trying to hide amnesty for illegal aliens in the Defense Authorization bill by pretending that it is necessary for our Department of Defense and our military is a bunch of hooey and we all know it.

And, of course, Durbin then goes into a chorus of “they are only here to do the job that Americans won’t do” as he cites a survey that compares Hispanics to Caucasians:

The DREAM Act doesn’t mandate military service. A student who is otherwise eligible could earn legal status by attending college. It would be inconsistent with the spirit our volunteer military to force young people to enlist as a condition for obtaining legal status.

But the DREAM Act creates a strong incentive for military service. And many DREAM Act kids come from a demographic group that is already predisposed towards military service. A 2004 survey by the Rand Corporation found that 45 percent of Hispanic males and 31 percent of Hispanic females between ages 16 and 21 were very likely to serve in the Armed Forces, compared to 24 percent of White men and 10 percent of White women.

Ok, that’s Dick Durbin’s spin on the Dream Act but let’s get a few thoughts from a person that actually possesses a bit of sanity and wisdom…

Kris Kobach wrote an article for The Heritage Foundation after the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 (S. 2611) was passed by the U.S. Sen­ate about this amendment in which he explains that the Dream Act has less to do with our military and a whole lot to do with a general amnesty:

The DREAM Act is a nightmare. It repeals a 1996 federal law that prohibits any state from offering in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens unless the state also offers in-state tuition rates to all U.S. citizens. On top of that, the DREAM Act offers a separate amnesty to illegal-alien students.

It also gives amnesty to ten states that openly violate Federal law, Kobach writes:

Events of the past 10 years illustrate how the DREAM Act would undermine the rule of law. In September 1996, Congress passed the landmark Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA). Led by Lamar Smith (R-TX) in the House of Representatives and Alan Simpson (R-WY) in the Senate, Congress significantly tougened the nation’s immigration laws. To his credit, President Bill Clinton signed the bill into law.

Open-borders advocates in some states — most notably California — had already raised the possi­bility of offering in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens who attend public universities. To prevent such a development, the IIRIRA’s sponsors inserted a clearly worded provision that prohibited any state from doing so unless it provided the same discounted tuition to all U.S. citizens:

“Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an alien who is not lawfully present in the United States shall not be eligible on the basis of residence within a State (or a political subdivision) for any postsecondary education benefit unless a citizen or national of the United States is eligible for such a benefit (in no less an amount, duration, and scope) without regard to whether the citizen or national is such a resident.”

Members of Congress reasoned that no state would be interested in giving up the extra revenue from out-of-state students, so this provision would ensure that illegal aliens would not be rewarded with a taxpayer-subsidized college education. The IIRIRA’s proponents never imagined that some states might simply disobey federal law.

But, according to Kobach, that didn’t stop some of the states:

The majority of state legislatures had the good sense to reject the idea, but eight states followed the examples of California and Texas, including some states in the heart of “red” America. Today, the 10 states that offer in-state tuition to illegal aliens are California, Illinois, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, and Washington.

In most of these states, the law was passed under cover of darkness because public opinion was strongly against subsidizing the college education of illegal aliens at taxpayer expense. The governors even declined to hold press conferences or signing ceremonies heralding the new laws.

Under the “cover of darkness” – sound familiar? What our constituents don’t know, won’t hurt us … or so they think.

But in-state tuition isn’t the only ‘gift’ in the Dream Act that Koback found:

This amnesty opens a wide path to citizenship for any alien who entered the country before the age of 16 and has been in the country for at least five years. As with the rest of the Senate bill, the guiding notion seems to be “The longer you have violated federal law, the better.”

Beyond that, all the alien needs is a high school diploma or a GED earned in the United States. Alternatively, he need only persuade an institution of higher education in the United States — any com­munity college, technical school, or college — to admit him.

The DREAM Act abandons any pretense of “tem­porary status” for the illegal aliens who apply. Instead, all amnesty recipients are awarded lawful permanent resident (green card) status. The only caveat is that the alien’s status is considered “conditional” for the first six years. To move on to the nor­mal green card, the alien need only obtain a degree from any institution of higher education, complete two years toward a bachelor’s degree, or show that doing so would present a hardship to himself or his family members. Of course, an alien with a normal green card can bring in family members and seek citizenship.

Furthermore, the DREAM Act makes it absurdly easy for just about any illegal alien — even one who does not qualify for the amnesty — to evade the law. According to Section 624(f), once an alien files an application — any application, no matter how ridic­ulous — the federal government is prohibited from deporting him. Moreover, with few exceptions, fed­eral officers are prohibited from either using infor­mation from the application to deport the alien or sharing that information with another federal agency, under threat of up to $10,000 fine.

Thus, an alien’s admission that he has violated federal immigration law cannot be used against him — even if he never had any chance of qualifying for the DREAM Act amnesty in the first place. The DREAM Act also makes illegal aliens eligible for various federal student loans and work-study programs.

What part of NO don’t these clowns understand? The American people have angrily tried to shout down amnesty and public benefits to people who illegally enter this country but Durbin and Company continue to try to spend our tax dollars on it anyway.

It is typical for our elected officials to betray us by taking parts of failed legislation and attaching them to legislation that they know will pass.

This has to be stopped now or the amnesty bill we just succeeded in killing will be resurrected and passed – piece-by-piece.

We are going to have to watch these guys like a bunch of two-year-olds. I’ve got to tell you, friends, I sure get tired of babysitting them and I hope we elect some adults in 2008.

CALL BOTH OF YOUR SENATORS AND TELL THEM TO VOTE NO FOR THE DURBIN-HAGEL-LUGAR DREAM ACT AMENDMENT TO H.R. 1585!

Your Senators’ phone numbers are online here.

Hat tip to Debbie at Right Truth for the gem of a post above that reminds us of who we’re really dealing with when it comes to disingenuous members of the U.S. Senate.

For another reminder of what the so-called immigration-reform efforts of people like Sens. Ted Kennedy and John McCain amount to, click here.

For merchandise bearing a message that President George W. Bush and members of Congress need to hear, click here.

Share this post now!
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Twitter

Tags: · , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

15 responses so far ↓

  • 1 NoisyRoom.net » Blog Archive » Noisy News Around the Web - 07/17/2007… // Jul 17, 2007 at 6:18 pm

    [...] ‘They’re back!’ Senator’s DREAM Act is Our Nightmare – Bob McCarty Writes – 2nd Post of the Day [...]

  • 2 sandy // Jul 21, 2007 at 8:41 pm

    i dont think you can consider this an amnesty. in order for it to be an amnesty, these kids have had to commit a crime in the first place. most of these kids were brought here with their parents at an age where they were too young to even understand the legal aspect of their actions. it is wrong to punish kids for their parents’ actions.

  • 3 hotoffthepress // Jul 21, 2007 at 9:15 pm

    Sandy — Whether or not one refers to it as “amnesty” is beside the point. The DREAM Act provides in-state tuition to people who are not even citizens. My kids, on the other hand, will have to pay out-of-state tuition should they choose to attend college outside of our state of residence — and they ARE legal citizens! That’s patently unfair! I also don’t like it when a senator sneaks legislation into another bill simply because it couldn’t make it through on its own merits. Thanks for posting. — Bob

  • 4 Cindy // Jul 21, 2007 at 10:49 pm

    These young kids are innocent. It’s not their fault to come here but their parent’s. Most of these young kids are smart and intelligent and if given a chance, soon they will be a pride 0f our country too. I am an american but was given a chance to live in one of the third world countries because my father was a military. I can really say that we are very lucky to have live in this wonderful country. Our country is blessed and the One up there wants us to share this blessing. To err is human but to forgive is divine. God will be most happy to help these young innocent kids.

  • 5 hotoffthepress // Jul 21, 2007 at 10:53 pm

    Cindy — I am a Christian and, believe me, have nothing against these kids. Who could? I do, however, take issue with politicians who provide special rights (i.e., in-state tuition) to populations based upon nationality, ethnic group or religious beliefs. (See my comment in reply to “Sandy” above. Thanks for posting. — Bob

  • 6 Pooja // Jul 24, 2007 at 12:54 am

    I think its rediculous to say that UNDOCUMENTED students who seek better oppertunities through education can become citizens and just bring in more people from other countries because you can always reduce the QUOTA OF VISAS that are handed out to different countries infact that has nothing to do with making our economy, principles, and culture stronger by allowing these people a space of acceptance and prosperity. We are spending our taxes in a war that is proven to be a lie, but yet we can not continue the beautiful legacy of the American dream for these people.

  • 7 Mark // Jul 24, 2007 at 5:09 am

    Hi Bob,

    I have a question re: the in-state tuition at colleges and universities while U.S.-born citizens and legal immigrants would receive no such benefit. Isn’t this a direct violation of the “equal protection under the law” clausse and therefore in and of itself either already illegal, or subject to challenge in the court system?

    It also seems civil rights laws will have to be modified so they cover U.S. and state laws as they apply to legal immigrants and U.S. citizens vs. illegal immigrants.

  • 8 hotoffthepress // Jul 24, 2007 at 8:00 am

    Pooja — I can’t tell whether you’re for or against the DREAM Act. You misspelled three words — it’s, ridiculous and opportunities — in your first sentence. Plus, that sentence lacks proper punctuation and is what your English teacher would call a “run-on sentence”. As for your final point, I’ll say this: The war has not been proven to be a lie. Far from it, it has given liberals an opportunity to show their true colors — colors that run. Thanks for posting! — Bob

  • 9 hotoffthepress // Jul 24, 2007 at 8:04 am

    Mark — In a fair and just world, yes, I think the in-state tuition arrangement for illegals — as part of the DREAM Act — would be deemed illegal. Unfortunately, we don’t live in a fair and just world. As for civil rights laws, I wouldn’t hold my breath in anticipation of those being modified in your favor. Thanks for posting. — Bob

  • 10 Martha // Jul 24, 2007 at 6:46 pm

    Mark, I would have to definately disagree with you on this one. Although DREAM Act might provide in state tuition to the youth who would qualify under the bill, they would still have to pay out of state tuition while that process is enacted. Also its a commonly known fact, that every student who moves to another state has to pay out of state tuition! Residency is determined by how long you’ve lived in the state.

    These kids should not be targetted. Its unfair and not very Christian as we must love our neighbors especially the young folks

  • 11 Backbones // Aug 1, 2007 at 12:05 am

    Somewhere along the line ones ancestors were also immigrants of this country. They may come to america legally or illegally because america had plead amnesty to illegal immigrants twice in US history. Even before then Pilgrams did not have permission from the native americans to come here leading to horrible deaths.

    Thing is these students are already here they’ve soaked our culture learned our history and why not let them stay?

    Many of these students are way more educated then our own children. These illegal immigrants have the will to strive for education and what they want. What about our children they strive for video games and potato chips and maybe a nice couch?

    You state that they take taxpayers money have you also considered that they pay tax too? Yes they do and i can vouch for it. And where do thier tax go? To our american children who skips school and sells drugs to its peers?
    We have invested so much money in them and now its time for them to go to college we should continue to support them and not do it half way! other wise we would live up to what other countries call us “Lazy Americans” If we can support higher education that means that the taxes would come back to you later in social security. Its like opening a CD account and never going back to claim it. Since we have nutured them up to college not letting them work and attend further education would only be our loss.

    You claim that they take our money yet if they dont pass the dream act the immigrants would really take our money and never return it. If we pass it atleast we would get back some of our investments. If we keep supporting them up to 12th grade needless to say our national deficiet would only get larger.

    College spot wise, last i check this country was based on capitalism competition must arise for people to better themselfs if American citizen complain that illegal immigrants are taking thier college spots isint that more of a communism thought? If American Citizens want to get into the better colleges that illegal immigrants can get into then maybe they should get off of the couch and start some hard-core studying. Our children are already considered one of the most uneducated needless to say not bright children in the world! If we pass the dream act we would have a higher rate for further education then we wouldnt be such “Lazy Americans” for a change.
    If we give them a chance these bright bound for college students they might be able to change the world. Who knows maybe even a cure to cancer and find another earth but are we giving them a chance?

    P.S. Whatever happened to the word ‘HUMANITY’? I can only speak for myself fore i am not a cold hearted american. Other people might be but not me.

  • 12 hotoffthepress // Aug 1, 2007 at 7:10 am

    Backbones — If you could read better than you can write, you would see I’ve explained my position in several comments above. The fact that your comment above has more than two-dozen spelling and punctuation errors — including the unpatriotic use of a lower-case “a” with the words, America and American, on at least five occasions — makes me wonder whether you’re an illegal alien posing as a concerned American. For all I know, you paid in-state tuition after illegally entering this country from Mexico. For all I know… — Bob

  • 13 Marian // Aug 3, 2007 at 9:15 am

    Bob, you are supposed to leave one or two spaces after a period.

  • 14 hotoffthepress // Aug 3, 2007 at 9:45 am

    Marian — WordPress doesn’t allow you to leave two spaces; otherwise, I would. As for the ending of the comment above, that’s intended to imply that I have much more to say but refrained from saying it. Because I can’t tell whether or not you’re being sarcastic, I’ll end simply. Thanks for posting. — Bob

  • 15 Modified ‘DREAM Act’ Being Reintroduced « Bob McCarty Writes // Sep 20, 2007 at 7:23 am

    [...] No Comments One of the most-read items in recent months at Bob McCarty Writes™ is a post, ‘They’re back!’ Senator’s DREAM Act is Our Nightmare, which highlighted the pitfalls of pro-illegal immigration legislation backed by Sen. Dick Durbin [...]