Bob McCarty Writes

Humor, Politics, Culture & Capitalism @ BobMcCarty.com

Bob McCarty Writes header image 2

Listen to ‘Allman and Crane in the Morning’

August 18th, 2008 · 1 Comment

It’s 12:20 a.m. Central, and I just received an e-mail from Jamie Allman, asking if I would appear as a guest on 97.1 FM Talk’s Allman & Crane in the Morning program at 7:45 a.m. Tuesday morning.  Specifically, he wants to discuss the “Ramadan Coke” post I wrote and published Monday afternoon.

Thanks to Michelle Malkin at Hot Air, that post is getting a lot of attention in the blogosphere.

Anyway, I told Jamie I would be glad to talk about the topic with him, so be sure to listen all morning — and especially at 7:45 a.m.

Important Note: If you live in the St. Louis area and want to listen live, tune in to 97.1 FM on your radio or listen via the web site.  If you can’t listen live, be sure to visit the web site and listen to the podcast.  If you don’t live in the St. Louis area and want to listen to the broadcast live or via podcast, visit the web site.

Share BMW:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Twitter

Tags: · , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 response so far ↓

  • 1 Melissa Doyle // Aug 25, 2008 at 10:30 pm

    Have you heard of this and is it true?

    The following is an article from the July 7, 2008, issue #27 from ‘The
    > American Free Press’ Newspaper, an article by Assistant editor, Pat
    > Shannon.
    >
    > ‘It now appears that Barack Obama is constitutionally ineligible for
    > the office of president. John McCain’s eligibility was established in
    > 1964, when courts ruled Sen. Barry Goldwater was eligible although he
    > was born in Arizona when it was a territory, not a state. McCain was
    > born in the Panama Canal Zone when it was a U.S. territory.
    >
    > And, even as the controlled media continues to ignore the
    > ineligibility of Obama, it will not go away. While few doubt that the
    > Democrats will manage to pull off his nomination, all remain poised to
    > view the legal performance.
    >
    > The first hurdle will be having Obama produce his birth certificate,
    > which so far he has refused to do, and prove that he was born
    > in Hawaii on August 4, 1961,as he has always claimed. There is
    > speculation that his American mother may have brought him
    > toHonolulu shortly after his birth in Kenya, but no proof of that has
    > been shown.
    >
    > According to the law on the books at the time of Obama’s birth, the
    > office of president requires that a candidate be a natural citizen if
    > the child was not born to two U.S. citizen parents. Since he was
    > not,should it be proven that Obama was not born in Hawaii, as claimed,
    > he is ineligible without further debate. But assuring that he was
    > born there, he has another problem.
    >
    > According to a legal researcher who has contacted the AFP, U.S. law
    > very clearly states: ‘If only one parent is a U.S. citizen at the
    > time of one’s birth, that parent must have resided in the United
    > States for a minimum of 10 years, five of which must be after the age
    > of 16.’ And therein lies Obama’s new problem.
    >
    > Barack Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen.
    >
    > Interestingly, there isn’t much paperwork on the marriage of Obama’s
    > parents, and this has a few researchers speculating that it never took
    > place at all. On page 27 of ‘Obama: From Promise to Power’, David
    > Mendell writes: ‘Obama later confessed that he never searched for the
    > government documents on the marriage, although Madelyn (Obama’s
    > maternal grandmother) insisted they were legally married.’ He also
    > notes that Obama’s father apparently was not legally divorced from his
    > first wife back in Kenya at the time, a point of contention that
    > ultimately led to their separation. This also would suggest that there
    > may never have been any legal marriage by Obama’s parents at all, but
    > the Constitution does not ban an illegitimate child from the White
    > House, as long as he was born inside the U.S.
    >
    > Obama’s mother was born in Kansas and was only 18 when Obama was
    > born.. This means even though she satisfied the citizen requirement
    > for 10
    >
    > years, she was not a citizen for at least five years prior to Obama’s
    > birth. In essence, the mother alone is not old enough to qualify her
    > son for automatic U.S. citizenship. At most, two years elapsed from
    > his mother turning 16 to the time of Barack Obama’s birth when she was
    > 18. His mother would have needed to have been 16 + 5 = 21 years old at
    > the time of Barack Obama’s birth for him to be a natural-born citizen.
    > Barack Obama was already three years old at the time his mother turned
    > 21.
    >
    > Technically, Obama should have been naturalized as a citizen, but
    > that, of course, would disqualify him from holding the office of
    > president. If the allegations are accurate,America could install in
    > January of 2009 a new president who is not even a U.S. citizen,
    > neither born nor naturalized.
    >
    > It should be demanded that Obama produce his 1961 Hawaiian birth
    > certificate.
    >
    > If he cannot satisfactorily do so, he should be deemed immediately
    > ineligible to hold the office of president.’

Leave a Comment