<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will &#8216;Bradley Effect&#8217; Benefit John McCain?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobmccarty.com/2008/10/17/will-bradley-effect-benefit-john-mccain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobmccarty.com/2008/10/17/will-bradley-effect-benefit-john-mccain/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=will-bradley-effect-benefit-john-mccain</link>
	<description>Humor, Politics, Culture &#38; Capitalism @ BobMcCarty.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:03:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Donar</title>
		<link>http://bobmccarty.com/2008/10/17/will-bradley-effect-benefit-john-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-9030</link>
		<dc:creator>David Donar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobmccarty.com/?p=7855#comment-9030</guid>
		<description>Thank you for still thinking of me Bob!  The Elections tend to put us behind fences, but I know we&#039;ll have plenty of material after this year!  I still love your site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for still thinking of me Bob!  The Elections tend to put us behind fences, but I know we&#8217;ll have plenty of material after this year!  I still love your site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotoffthepress2</title>
		<link>http://bobmccarty.com/2008/10/17/will-bradley-effect-benefit-john-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-8962</link>
		<dc:creator>hotoffthepress2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobmccarty.com/?p=7855#comment-8962</guid>
		<description>CT -- The Wurzelbacher Effect?  &lt;em&gt;I like it!&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CT &#8212; The Wurzelbacher Effect?  <em>I like it!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://bobmccarty.com/2008/10/17/will-bradley-effect-benefit-john-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-8955</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 10:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobmccarty.com/?p=7855#comment-8955</guid>
		<description>Well if Obama doesn&#039;t get elected, forget about the Bradely effect, you could call this one the Wurzelbacher Effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if Obama doesn&#8217;t get elected, forget about the Bradely effect, you could call this one the Wurzelbacher Effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotoffthepress2</title>
		<link>http://bobmccarty.com/2008/10/17/will-bradley-effect-benefit-john-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-8941</link>
		<dc:creator>hotoffthepress2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 23:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobmccarty.com/?p=7855#comment-8941</guid>
		<description>goat,

Yes, I realize there are other examples; unfortunately, the one people most recognize is the &quot;Bradley Effect&quot; -- due to media use, I&#039;m sure.  Still, thanks for the input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>goat,</p>
<p>Yes, I realize there are other examples; unfortunately, the one people most recognize is the &#8220;Bradley Effect&#8221; &#8212; due to media use, I&#8217;m sure.  Still, thanks for the input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goat</title>
		<link>http://bobmccarty.com/2008/10/17/will-bradley-effect-benefit-john-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-8940</link>
		<dc:creator>goat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 23:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobmccarty.com/?p=7855#comment-8940</guid>
		<description>Bob, what I understand of the Bradley effect is not really about race. In that election there was also an anti gun initiative on the ballot that Bradley came out in support of late in the campaign. The initiative went down big and with it Bradley. There was a huge turn out push to defeat the initiative with turnout over 90% in rural counties throughout Ca. Bradley himself blamed his loss on his support for the initiative. James Taranto posted a lengthy email a few weeks ago from a GOP insider that was working for Deukmejian during that campaign that explains it well.  There are examples though that support the theory better than this one notably this years Dem primary in NH where Hillary pulled out a win after Obama was by as many as ten in the polls leading into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, what I understand of the Bradley effect is not really about race. In that election there was also an anti gun initiative on the ballot that Bradley came out in support of late in the campaign. The initiative went down big and with it Bradley. There was a huge turn out push to defeat the initiative with turnout over 90% in rural counties throughout Ca. Bradley himself blamed his loss on his support for the initiative. James Taranto posted a lengthy email a few weeks ago from a GOP insider that was working for Deukmejian during that campaign that explains it well.  There are examples though that support the theory better than this one notably this years Dem primary in NH where Hillary pulled out a win after Obama was by as many as ten in the polls leading into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
