Coal Industry Post
Multiple Guest Appearances
"Mohammed the Bear" Stuff
"Don't Taze Me, Bro!"
"Yikes! I Might Be...Militia!"
Ramadan Coke Post
Credentialed Poll Watcher
HERO SHOT
Mitt Romney Post
"2007 BugsGoneWild.com Calendar"
Ramadan Coke Post
As of 12-31-08
Click to view case documents.
Philip Berg, the prominent Philadelphia attorney and longtime Democrat who filed a federal lawsuit challenging Barack Obama’s qualifications to serve as president of the United States, announced today that Obama and the Democratic National Committee have “admitted” all of the numerous specific requests in the federal lawsuit. In my words, not his, it’s “still breathing.”
The admission comes, Berg wrote in a news release posted on his web site today, by way of the defendants “failure to timely respond to Requests for Admissions, all of the numerous specific requests in the Federal lawsuit. Obama is “NOT QUALIFIED” to be President and therefore Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President and the DNC shall substitute a qualified candidate. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.”
He added that “he filed Requests for Admissions on September 15, 2008 with a response by way of answer or objection had to be served within thirty [30] days. No response to the Requests for Admissions was served by way of response or objection. Thus, all of the Admissions directed to Obama and the DNC are deemed “ADMITTED.” Therefore, Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for president.”
In the remainder of the news release, Berg listed the following 56 items which he termed “Obama Admissions” as well as 27 he assigns to the DNC. To see them, click here.
Though Berg didn’t mention it in his news release, it’s worth noting that attorneys for Obama and the DNC filed a Motion to Dismiss yesterday, but Judge R. Barclay Surrick has yet to rule on the motion.
* * *
UDPATE:
Conflict Exists Over Where Obama Was Born
Obama Citizenship Lawsuit Tossed, SCOTUS Next!
BLAZING HOT UPDATE 11/22/08: Did Ambassador Confirm Obama Born in Kenya?
14 responses so far ↓
1 Linda // Oct 22, 2008 at 5:33 am
On that motion to Dismiss filed yesterday –
the ruling appears to be “Granted With Prejudice”
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2008cv04083/281573/24/0.swf
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILIP J. BERG, )
)
Plaintiff, )
) Civil Action No. 08-cv-4083
v. )
) Order
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA,et al
., )
)
Defendants. )
ORDER
AND NOW, this ____________ day of ___________, 2008, upon consideration of
Defendant Federal Election Commission’s Motion to Dismiss, it is hereby ORDERED
that said Motion is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE.
______________________________
United States District Judge
2 hotoffthepress2 // Oct 22, 2008 at 6:11 am
Linda — I don’t see how you’ve reached your conclusion. The document is not signed, meaning that it was prepared by the lawyers for the judge to sign. Until he signs it, however, it’s just ink on paper.
3 edeldoug // Oct 22, 2008 at 11:15 am
1) Attorneys on both sides prepare documents for the judge’s signature should the judge decide in their favor. Without the signature, it is meaningless. Obama and the DNC have both waited till the LAST POSSIBLE moment to respond, and the response has been to delay further and to move to dismiss. Obama’s motion to dismiss has not been ruled upon – it has not been granted. Meantime, Obama’s motion to stay discovery (stop the requirement to produce the documents) has not been granted, so now that the time to produce the documents has EXPIRED, Berg is pointing out that LEGALLY Obama has ADMITTED to the allegations by failure to respond in a timely manner. He cites chapter and verse on why this is so.
Further, despite Berg’s linkage with 9-11 conspiracy etc, this case has merit. The judge could easily have dismissed it on several occasions if he deemed it without merit. Obama could make it go away by simply producing documents that you or I could produce within 24 hours! Interesting to note that Berg is a DEMOCRAT… a Hillary Supporter and a Bush Basher. But he knows Obama is an aberration.
Berg’s suit is in Federal Court… challenging his eligibility to run. There are other lawsuits on a state level, challenging their states’ failure to vet Obama’s eligibility before placing his name on the state ballot.
Marquis v Reed is a case in the state of WA, challenging WA Secretary of State’s failure to verify Obama’s eligibility.
See http://starboard.blogtownhall.com for info on the lawsuits and other vitally important information.
4 ace // Oct 23, 2008 at 10:53 pm
Yeah, that document was prepared by Obama’s/Soetero’s lawyer for the judge’s consideration. Berg also has one prepared that orders Obama’s/Soetero’s name be removed from the ballots.
BTW, did you know that this judge is a Clinton appointee? Just a coincidence, I’m sure.
5 hotoffthepress2 // Oct 23, 2008 at 11:56 pm
Clinton appointee? That would put an interesting twist on things.
6 marc salazar // Oct 24, 2008 at 11:06 pm
Go Hillary!!!!!!!!
7 hotoffthepress2 // Oct 25, 2008 at 6:07 am
marc — Funny!
8 Sherman Stanley // Oct 25, 2008 at 5:58 pm
It is amazing to me that with all of this information, basic truths, when you tell others about it, they think you are a crazy kook. They say, “someone has already checked this, he could never have gotten this far if he wasn’t a citizen.” This really shows how bad our own fellow citizens have become, to break our laws and hand our nation over to an enemy of the state.
9 Dr. bobbi Anne white // Oct 26, 2008 at 4:01 pm
th case was dismissed, but some astute observers have noticed discrepancies and that the decision appears to have been faxed at an earlier time to Surrick for his decision.
http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2008/10/26/judge-surrick-received-the-decision-he-issued/#more-4216
10 hotoffthepress2 // Oct 26, 2008 at 4:09 pm
Dr. bobbie – Yes, I pointed that out in a comment/update below this post.
11 Dave the Citizen // Nov 10, 2008 at 11:10 am
Obama is the President Elect so what would be the course of action if indeed he is not a Natual Born Citizen
12 hotoffthepress2 // Nov 10, 2008 at 11:22 am
Dave — I think the well is just about dry when it comes to attempts to prove or disprove his citizenship. Phillip Berg’s attempt, chronicled on this site and at Obama Crimes.com, is/was the best effort going.
13 Wes Freeman // Nov 17, 2008 at 5:24 pm
If he is sworn in without proving he is what he purports to be, will mean that half of the Country will not have a President only the gullible fools will have an idol made of lies.
14 Our long national Nightmare is over…. « The Old Right Daily // Dec 17, 2008 at 4:51 pm
[...] stayed away from this topic. Seeing people like Philip Berg (9/11 truther and Clinton Lackey) attached to this makes me unease. What’s worse is, fellow “conservatives” who [...]
Leave a Comment