Coal Industry Post
Multiple Guest Appearances
"Mohammed the Bear" Stuff
"Don't Taze Me, Bro!"
"Yikes! I Might Be...Militia!"
Ramadan Coke Post
Credentialed Poll Watcher
HERO SHOT
Mitt Romney Post
"2007 BugsGoneWild.com Calendar"
Ramadan Coke Post
As of 12-31-08
According to a news release on Phillip Berg’s web site, ObamaCrimes.com, the judge in Berg v. Obama has dismissed the case and Berg plans to appeal the case to the United States Supreme Court. Details are available in the text of the news release below:
Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court as Obama is “NOT” qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court
For Immediate Release: – 10/25/08 – Contact Info at end.
UPDATE: Ruling attached at end. It’s a really poor copy, but it is all we have for the moment. Willl put up a better copy when we get one.
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
Berg said, “I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick’s decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.
This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States – the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world – then who does?
So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.
According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.
What happened to ‘…Government of the people, by the people, for the people,…’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.
We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.
Our website obamacrimes.com now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.
Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.
* * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to ObamaCrimes.com.
# # #
Note 1: Visit ObamaCrimes.com to see the “poor copy” of the ruling as it has not yet appeared on the Justia web site where all other court documents to date are posted.
Note 2: For more details from a legal viewpoint, visit America’s Right.
UPDATE 10/26/08 1:32 p.m. CST: The folks at the J.A.ME.S. blog raise an interesting possibility in a post today. Did Judge Surrick receive the decision in the Berg v. Obama shortly before faxing it out to the world?
* * *
In case you’re not familiar with the background of this lawsuit, I’ve listed several of the posts I’ve published to date on the matter below:
* * *
BLAZING HOT UPDATE 11/22/08: Did Ambassador Confirm Obama Born in Kenya?
20 responses so far ↓
1 john // Oct 25, 2008 at 6:29 pm
Good luck with an appeal to the Supreme Court. Half of that bunch believes in a “living constitution,” meaning they can make anything up as they go along…
2 Ted // Oct 25, 2008 at 6:37 pm
Handled right, the Fed District Court throwing out Berg for lack of standing can present a political check-mate “win” on appeal for the anti-Obama side (if not in law, in the Court of Public Opinion). Here’s how: SIMPLY SPREAD AROUND OBAMA’S APPELLATE BRIEF HAVING TO ARGUE AGAINST AN AMERICAN VOTER’S RIGHT TO RAISE THE QUESTION UNDER THE CONSTITUTION. Should be a PR disaster for the Dems and Obama!!!
3 Kalakea Pupu // Oct 25, 2008 at 9:28 pm
Obama’s Motion to Dismiss already argues that an individual American does not have standing to
complain about whether or not Constitutional requirements are met by Presidential candidate.
He also argued that an individual can’t be harmed in an actionable compensable way by any such lack of Constitutional requirements being met, even if everything Berg alleges is true.
4 Vince // Oct 26, 2008 at 4:29 am
Charles Dickens once said, famously, “The Law is an Ass.” How true this statement stands. Judge Surrick did not address whether or not Senator Obama is eligible to run for the highest office in the land. Judge Surrick never even asked for proof of a birth certificate, but rather stated that ‘We the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the US Constitution. Well, thank you honorable Surrick as you’ve helped me to decide to cross party lines and vote for Senator McCain. I wonder who Judge Surrick will vote for.
5 Utah Stan // Oct 26, 2008 at 1:19 pm
There are at least ten lawsuits, though one of the ten–in Hawaii–may be over for good. Ref:
http://frontpage.americandaughter.com/?p=2104
The VA suit may be more promising because the judge has already ruled in favor of emergency expedition, i.e., proceeding quickly.
6 Dustin // Oct 27, 2008 at 2:37 am
It will be interesting to see what happens. A number of states have filed lawsuits requiring Obama present documentation or they will not post his name on the 2008 election ballots. The whole concept behind this makes me wonder a lot about what Obama has to hide, otherwise why not just present the documentation and have it done and over with. He is only hurting himself and even if he is found eligible, he will destroy his reputation. We spent the last 8 years with a President who never told the American people what was going on and now we are going to spend another 4 more??? Are you kidding me.
7 hotoffthepress2 // Oct 27, 2008 at 6:39 am
Dustin — I must correct you. It will only “destroy his reputation” among people who don’t pay attention to the mainstream news media folks who are “in the tank’ for Obama.
8 AdrianS // Oct 27, 2008 at 5:49 pm
Regarding the judge’s remarks that Congress must give or bestow certain rights on citizens
prior to their exercise, I dare say he is WRONG. The Constitution ALREADY does that and
the judge is criminally insane.
“If Congress determines that citizens, voters, or party members should police the
Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency…”
The rights not currently given to the Federal Government, or the state(s) are reserved for
the people. The judge is a COMMUNIST also. He figures that the rights must come first from
the Congress. This is not so with our form of government and our Constitution. The judge
is just plain outright stupid. Phillip J. Berg already has the right specified in the
Constitution to DEMAND that Barack Obama prove his is a natural born citizen. Else,
Barack Obama is in criminal violation of the law — the Constitution for his failure
and/or refusal to comply with the Constitution. Such as it is, Barack Obama’s contempt
for the people, voters, Mr. Berg, and citizens of the United States MUST NOT be allowed
to stand. He is subterfuge. Barack Obama is a liar, a fraud and a criminal.
Also, the judge himself has been sworn to uphold, honor, protect and enforce the
Constitution. I dare say the judge may be criminally liable for his gross malfeasance
and/or dereliction of duty. We must REMOVE the judge and all others like him because
they do not honor or respect the will of the people. And, if they hide behind legalisms,
then they do so at their own peril — for it is the people who know and understand what
this judge has done that say his is a FARCE!
God bless America. And, God help us upright the harm and the wrongs simpletons like this
judge have done to our country.
In any case, REJECT BARACK OBAMA.
Elect John McCain and Sarah Palin.
9 KD // Oct 29, 2008 at 11:27 am
This is just more proof of how corrupt this country has become. From what I understand no records of Mr. Obama have been released, i.e. birth, school, applications for assistance, college to name a few. These things seem so easy and basic to those of us who obey the law and love this country. We have far to many rascals in our government, this one takes the cake. If our judicial system, news media, or leaders had any back bone they would stand up for our country and through this bum out before we start with the “IS” questions. Can the acting President of this nation hold any inquiries in this regard?
10 hotoffthepress2 // Oct 29, 2008 at 11:28 am
KD — Sadly, Obama might become “Rascal in Chief.”
11 Jim // Nov 5, 2008 at 2:49 am
Is there any chance that anything can still be proven or pressed now that Obama has won the election. What an embarassment. Can you imagine the mess? Oops, we should have insisted on seeing that documentation.
12 Lori // Nov 7, 2008 at 6:41 pm
It is a fact, blatantly before us, that there is something very diabolical going on! This is
much larger than just egos…our very Constitution and Government are being undermined by powers greater than men.
These men, Obama and all who protect him,
are propelled and protected by an elite few
who have great power on this earth through out
the world. If this attack by Obama and his kind is not halted soon we will watch our Freedom and Nation, and God diappear from reach! We
are standing on a threshold of world wide tyranny like the world has never seen before. We can not let this happen! Do what ever you need to do to get this information out…That Barrack Obama will bring change..a kind we shudder to even consider!
13 hotoffthepress2 // Nov 7, 2008 at 6:44 pm
Lori — Everything will work out in keeping with God’s will.
14 TRS // Nov 15, 2008 at 6:34 pm
RE: Post by hotoffthepress2 (Nov. 7)
Lori, everything will work out in keeping with “The Rule of Law” and the United States Constitution. President-elect Obama will never be sworn in as our next President…book it!
15 hotoffthepress2 // Nov 15, 2008 at 6:41 pm
TRS — Sixty-five days and a wake-up until inauguration day. Hope remains.
16 gsschauble // Nov 20, 2008 at 3:46 pm
If a man cannot prove he is legally elligable to be
president.Then he will never really be president,
but rather a part of a conspiracy,which in God’s
time will be revealed,and shamefully exposed.
17 dan // Nov 23, 2008 at 6:07 pm
Not sure I understand. We’ve got a president now who has broken all sorts of laws over the last 8 years and done plenty to undermine the constitution but apparently that’s ok. Now along comes Obama and everyone is hot to find something, anything, to derail his presidency. If these clowns manage to somehow disqualify Obama at this late date there will be massive rioting in the streets as there should be.
18 hotoffthepress2 // Nov 23, 2008 at 6:11 pm
dan, dan, dan — If Bush was guilty of anything, don’t you think the Dems in Congress would have been able to prove it. The answer is “Yes.” Since they haven’t, perhaps you should simply admit you have a flawed candidate with “issues” that should have prevented him from getting as far as he did. As for rioting in the streets, you should be ashamed for promoting such a thing.
19 ant // Dec 22, 2008 at 10:36 pm
He is a citizen because his mother was a citizen and her parents also, that is the only requirement, if you guys just look it up. McCain, was not born on American soil either, he was qualified.
20 hotoffthepress2 // Dec 23, 2008 at 8:04 am
ant — You’re wrong! There’s a lot more to it than that. Read the articles about it on this blog. Get educated!
Leave a Comment