Bob McCarty Writes

Since Aug. 23, posts about Phillip Berg’s ongoing legal challenge of Barack Obama’s eligibility — or lack thereof — to serve as the 44th president of the United States have generated more page views than any other topic on this blog.  I expect that trend to continue if news surfacing this week is any indication.

Click to enlarge.

In a post yesterday, America’s Right reported Philadelphia attorney Philip Berg will file a motion with the Supreme Court of the United States in an attempt to further prevent the president-elect from taking office in January.  The news came one day after the deadline set by Supreme Court Justice David Souter for Obama and the Democratic National Committee to respond to Berg’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari had passed without an answer.

So what does Berg’s filing of the motion mean?  Jeff Schreiber, the man behind America’s Right, offered this estimate:

From what I could gather, the emergency motion for immediate injunction contains two main parts — in filing the motion, Berg is looking for the Court (1) to prohibit the certification of electors by the governors of each individual state in order to stay the Electoral College from casting votes for Obama on December 15, and (2) to stay the official counting of any votes for Obama by Vice President Dick Cheney, the House of Representatives and United States Senate on January 8, 2009, pending any decision on his appeal.

Click here to read the full post at America’s Right.

Click here or on the image at right to see an advertisement/open letter from Robert L. Schulz, chairman of the We The People Foundation.

Developing…