<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red-Light Cameras &#8216;Gifts&#8217; That Keep on Giving (Corrected)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobmccarty.com/2008/12/31/red-light-cameras-gifts-that-keep-on-giving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobmccarty.com/2008/12/31/red-light-cameras-gifts-that-keep-on-giving/#utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=red-light-cameras-gifts-that-keep-on-giving</link>
	<description>Humor, Politics, Culture &#38; Capitalism @ BobMcCarty.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:53:16 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barnet Fagel</title>
		<link>http://bobmccarty.com/2008/12/31/red-light-cameras-gifts-that-keep-on-giving/comment-page-1/#comment-13022</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnet Fagel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobmccarty.com/?p=10636#comment-13022</guid>
		<description>CHICAGO BECOMES ONE BIG RED LIGHT DISTRICT!  – 2/8/2009

The Chicago Tribune’s February 7th editorial focused on the CTA being “encouraged” by the driver’s union to pay their member’s 1,200 red light camera tickets for a total of about $120.000! The CTA deemed the tickets to be a “bureaucratic nuisance” even as the rest of the public has to pay whether you own a car or not! It’s not inherently fair nor is it legal to hold one group of persons “above the law” while indiscriminately punishing another equal group for the same offenses. Citing CTA schedules and passenger safety excuses for running red lights doesn’t is no justification. 

Hundreds of millions in ticket revenue is just too tempting of a windfall for the city to ignore. Especially when it’s done under the “color of authority”, the color red. The entire city has become one enormous red light district. Traffic signals have historically been set to established national traffic engineering standards.  The accepted rules of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and the Institute of Transportation Engineers were established to promote safety, but they aren’t acknowledged in Chicago! Other city’s traffic experiences have shown accident increases after their respective red light camera installations. 

Red light cameras serve obediently 24 hours a day dutifully snapping pictures of license plates and converted at the “light speed” into a constant revenue stream that beats to the pulse of the politician’s pocketbook. What a golden thing it is to behold. The robocops have no regard for real traffic requirements such as the 85th percentile speed, approach velocity, forward head room, visual safety perception, mechanical maladies or radio frequency interference. 

Chicago joins the growing list of maniacal metropolises that include Chattanooga, TN, Dallas, TX, Springfield, MO, Lubbock, TX, Nashville, TN and Union City, CA that have been caught grossly cheating their drivers by local media using short-timed yellow traffic lights. News outlets shined the light of truth and turned the cameras back onto this seditious and dangerous practice to allow the cities to balance their particular budgets.  Subsequent lengthening the yellow light timing results in fewer violations, less accidents, safer roads far less cost. 

Ticketed drivers can appear in front of a trained ticket clerk, but they soon find out that their “administrative” red light ticket challenges are stiffed by the political provisions of the ordinance. While these citations don’t currently add points to driver’s licenses, IT “CONVENIENTLY OUTLAWS” ANY LEGAL OR ETHICAL CHALLENGES. If drivers want to appeal their cases to a higher court another charge of $95 for a filing fee plus a mandatory downtown appearance. The city fathers figured the vast majority of drivers can’t afford the time coupled with almost no chance of winning to justify the effort. 

Apparently the laws of physics, motion or logic don’t apply within the windy city. The city has determined that all vehicles, drivers and intersections are identical by their very nature so a single three second yellow light timing standard is all that is needed, when actually it is barely the federal minimum. The city knowingly takes no notice of real world factors such as driver response times, vehicle size, inertia, road or visibility conditions that are recommended by traffic.

Because accepted traffic signal engineering practices are ignored the city it consciously and directly participates in ongoing cases of “spontaneous legal entrapment” each time any of the stop lights turn red. The city stifles the increased rear-end accident facts after red light camera installations in many other cities. “The city that works”, makes drivers work for the department of revenue and leaves the city politicians with blood on their hands!
Don&#039;t loose hope, I am researching a way to use the law to counterman the abuse...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHICAGO BECOMES ONE BIG RED LIGHT DISTRICT!  – 2/8/2009</p>
<p>The Chicago Tribune’s February 7th editorial focused on the CTA being “encouraged” by the driver’s union to pay their member’s 1,200 red light camera tickets for a total of about $120.000! The CTA deemed the tickets to be a “bureaucratic nuisance” even as the rest of the public has to pay whether you own a car or not! It’s not inherently fair nor is it legal to hold one group of persons “above the law” while indiscriminately punishing another equal group for the same offenses. Citing CTA schedules and passenger safety excuses for running red lights doesn’t is no justification. </p>
<p>Hundreds of millions in ticket revenue is just too tempting of a windfall for the city to ignore. Especially when it’s done under the “color of authority”, the color red. The entire city has become one enormous red light district. Traffic signals have historically been set to established national traffic engineering standards.  The accepted rules of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and the Institute of Transportation Engineers were established to promote safety, but they aren’t acknowledged in Chicago! Other city’s traffic experiences have shown accident increases after their respective red light camera installations. </p>
<p>Red light cameras serve obediently 24 hours a day dutifully snapping pictures of license plates and converted at the “light speed” into a constant revenue stream that beats to the pulse of the politician’s pocketbook. What a golden thing it is to behold. The robocops have no regard for real traffic requirements such as the 85th percentile speed, approach velocity, forward head room, visual safety perception, mechanical maladies or radio frequency interference. </p>
<p>Chicago joins the growing list of maniacal metropolises that include Chattanooga, TN, Dallas, TX, Springfield, MO, Lubbock, TX, Nashville, TN and Union City, CA that have been caught grossly cheating their drivers by local media using short-timed yellow traffic lights. News outlets shined the light of truth and turned the cameras back onto this seditious and dangerous practice to allow the cities to balance their particular budgets.  Subsequent lengthening the yellow light timing results in fewer violations, less accidents, safer roads far less cost. </p>
<p>Ticketed drivers can appear in front of a trained ticket clerk, but they soon find out that their “administrative” red light ticket challenges are stiffed by the political provisions of the ordinance. While these citations don’t currently add points to driver’s licenses, IT “CONVENIENTLY OUTLAWS” ANY LEGAL OR ETHICAL CHALLENGES. If drivers want to appeal their cases to a higher court another charge of $95 for a filing fee plus a mandatory downtown appearance. The city fathers figured the vast majority of drivers can’t afford the time coupled with almost no chance of winning to justify the effort. </p>
<p>Apparently the laws of physics, motion or logic don’t apply within the windy city. The city has determined that all vehicles, drivers and intersections are identical by their very nature so a single three second yellow light timing standard is all that is needed, when actually it is barely the federal minimum. The city knowingly takes no notice of real world factors such as driver response times, vehicle size, inertia, road or visibility conditions that are recommended by traffic.</p>
<p>Because accepted traffic signal engineering practices are ignored the city it consciously and directly participates in ongoing cases of “spontaneous legal entrapment” each time any of the stop lights turn red. The city stifles the increased rear-end accident facts after red light camera installations in many other cities. “The city that works”, makes drivers work for the department of revenue and leaves the city politicians with blood on their hands!<br />
Don&#8217;t loose hope, I am researching a way to use the law to counterman the abuse&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotoffthepress2</title>
		<link>http://bobmccarty.com/2008/12/31/red-light-cameras-gifts-that-keep-on-giving/comment-page-1/#comment-12395</link>
		<dc:creator>hotoffthepress2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 23:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobmccarty.com/?p=10636#comment-12395</guid>
		<description>Clay -- I guess it all depends upon how one defines &quot;search and seizure.&quot;  I suggest that anyone who receives a ticket without the personal assistance of a police officer take the legal advice I heard on the radio:  Don&#039;t pay it or, better yet, take a photo of a $100 bill and mail it in as payment.  Ha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clay &#8212; I guess it all depends upon how one defines &#8220;search and seizure.&#8221;  I suggest that anyone who receives a ticket without the personal assistance of a police officer take the legal advice I heard on the radio:  Don&#8217;t pay it or, better yet, take a photo of a $100 bill and mail it in as payment.  Ha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay Bowler</title>
		<link>http://bobmccarty.com/2008/12/31/red-light-cameras-gifts-that-keep-on-giving/comment-page-1/#comment-12394</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Bowler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 23:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobmccarty.com/?p=10636#comment-12394</guid>
		<description>Bob, I am sick of seeing cameras watching me everywhere I go. It&#039;s not just at intersections. Mayor Daley in Chicago wants to put them on all government vehicles to monitor and cite drivers with tickets. Can we claim this is a violation of the IV Amendment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, I am sick of seeing cameras watching me everywhere I go. It&#8217;s not just at intersections. Mayor Daley in Chicago wants to put them on all government vehicles to monitor and cite drivers with tickets. Can we claim this is a violation of the IV Amendment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
