Bob McCarty Writes

Humor, Politics, Culture & Capitalism @BobMcCarty

Bob McCarty Writes header image 2

Paulson Among Buyers of Failed IndyMac Bank

January 5th, 2009 · 3 Comments

The FDIC issued a news release Friday to let the world know the agency’s board had approved a letter of intent to sell IndyMac Bank to a thrift holding company controlled by IMB Management Holdings LP.  Though one of the men involved in purchasing the bank shares the same last name as Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson, members of the mainstream news media have failed to acknowledge that fact.

A Los Angeles Times report Saturday listed John Paulson as one of two hedge-fund operators (the other being billionaire George Soros) among a small group of owner-investors, while an article published Friday in the San Jose Business Journal noted that the limited partnership includes John Alfred Paulson, the same man.  Neither article, however, deemed it worthwhile to report that the man involved in purchasing a large failed bank shared the same last name as the man who oversees the nation’s banking system, Secretary Paulson.

Noticing that, I decided to see if any other news outlets had seen fit to address the nagging question, “Is John Alfred Paulson related to Henry M. Paulson?” After all, even the pseudo-journalists behind the desk at ESPN Sports Center know enough to toss in an occasional “No relation” upon noticing that two unrelated players who share the same last name.

Surprising me again, none of the articles I found — neither the above-mentioned articles nor others published in the Wall Street Journal Jan. 5, at Bloomberg.com Jan. 3 and via Associated Press Jan. 3 — addressed the question.  That’s when I decided to ask people who should know.

I called IMB’s corporate offices early this afternoon and was told to send an e-mail inquiry to Armel Leslie at Walek & Associates, IMB’s Madison Avenue public relations counsel.  Twice given the opportunity to respond to the question, “Is John Alfred Paulson related in any way to Secretary of the Treasury Henry M. Paulson?” the PR specialist responded by e-mail as follows:  “No relation” and “Yes, no relation.”

Though I had an answer, I was not yet convinced; therefore, I called the Treasury Department Public Affairs Office in Washington, D.C., and asked them to field a nearly-identical question, “Does Secretary Paulson have any immediate relatives by the name of John Alfred Paulson?”

With true bureaucratic efficiency, the buck was passed at least twice during my phone call before I was dispatched with a promise that someone would call me back with the answer.  Unfortunately, that was almost five hours ago.

Is John Alfred Paulson related to Henry M. Paulson? Perhaps not, but that’s not what motivated me to write this article.  Instead, my chief concern was the news media’s seemingly-collective decision to ignore any possible connection between the men.  That kind of collusion, I fear, might portend a much greater problem for our nation’s future than banking failures.

Tags: · , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 mp // Jan 10, 2009 at 9:16 pm

    Just buy Paulson’s recovery fund and don’t try to find out if they are related. Enjoy the ride

  • 2 Matt // Mar 30, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    I like your nick (the ultimate blogging machine) but I think the post speaks worse of your intelligence than is even possible. Let me explain…

    John paulson is an idol in the world of business…the “master of disaster” if you will. While hank was getting sideswiped at the treasury, john was busy making billions on naked CDS purchases — much like andrew lahde getting filthy rich as the bubble burst in 2007-8. Of all the douchebags out there, paulson was one of the handful who had the neccesary clarity to see what was coming and get rich off it. And john got *stupid* rich.

    So indicting him in an armchair conspiracy with the silver surfer (aka hank) is not only wholly inaccurate, but on the same level as saying warren Buffett beat up the pope. It’s just wrong.

    And yes. The sources you contacted DID think you were a tinfoil hat-wearing lunatic. Because this is precisely the kind of uneducated, apathetic quackery that gives them the impression.

  • 3 hotoffthepress2 // Mar 30, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    Matt — I’m afraid it speaks more of your intelligence. Had you been able to read the last paragraph, you would have appreciated the fact that I accomplished the objective of every post I publish (i.e., “Made you look!”).

Leave a Comment