Truth Remains Elusive 18 Years After Oklahoma City Bombing

I had just dropped off my oldest — and, at the time, only — son at the Montessori school he attended in Norman, Okla., when a KTOK radio reporter shared a live report about some kind of explosion in downtown Oklahoma City, 20 miles north of where I was.  It was only after more details began to flood in that the scope of the tragedy became evident.

Untold Stories of the OKC BombingFour years ago today, I published my first, albeit brief, article about the Oklahoma City Bombing.  No investigative journalism.  No interviews.  More than anything, just an observance.  Because I didn’t know much at the time.

That changed after I read Jayna Davis’ New York Times Best Seller, The Third Terrorist.

On June 7, 2009, I published a piece in which I called for the federal government to reopen its investigations Into TWA Flight 800 and the Oklahoma City Bombing.

On Sept. 27, 2009, I published another, Video Raises New Doubts About Oklahoma City Bombing Evidence, Investigation.  It included my first mention of Jesse Trentadue’s relentless campaign to obtain copies of pre-explosion surveillance video shot by cameras in downtown Oklahoma City and, in turn, learn the truth about the death of his brother, Kenneth Trentadue, while in federal custody in Oklahoma City.  It also included several statements attributed to Trentadue in a NewsOK.com article published that day.  Among them, one stood out:

“Four cameras in four different locations going blank at basically the same time on the morning of April 19, 1995. There ain’t no such thing as a coincidence.” — Jesse Trentadue

OKC Bombing InterviewsOn Sept. 28, 2009, I published three more articles — part 1 of 3, part 2 of 3 and Part 3 of 3 — based on my exclusive interview with author Davis who, after years of not speaking to anyone in the news media, broke her silence about the OKC Bombing videotapes.

On Sept. 30, 2009, I published another article based on my exclusive interview with David P. Schippers, a Chicago attorney who gained fame during the ’90s as the man who served as chief investigative counsel for the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee during the Clinton Impeachment Hearings, as manager of the proceedings that followed in the U.S. Senate, and as the author of the book, SELLOUT: The Inside Story of President Clinton’s Impeachment, chronicling those events.  NOTE:  He also served as director of the Justice Department’s Organized Crime Task Force in Chicago under Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy during the 1960s, though I didn’t realize that at the time I wrote this article.

On April 20, 2010, I shared political pundit Dick Morris’ observation that President Bill Clinton’s Waco actions render claims of an OKC Bombing cover-up more believable than ever.  Sadly, Morris’ claims only scratched the surface of a much larger crime.

Hussain Al-Hussaini (Quincy P.D. Photo)

Hussain Al-Hussaini (Quincy P.D. Photo)

More articles followed until, on March 11, 2011, I shared details about the arrest of Hussain Al-Hussaini, the man author Davis pegged as the third terrorist in her book of the same name, being arrested in Quincy, Mass.  Not surprisingly, no one in the mainstream news media showed interest in the man’s arrest, since the Timothy McVeigh-Terry Nichols narrative had already been “sold” to the American public.

After learning the Oklahoma City Bombing videotapes would be the subject of a federal court hearing in Salt Lake City May 11, I began covering Trentadue’s efforts more closely April 7, 2011.  I was particularly impressed by the attorney’s common-man reasoning he shared with Judge Clark Waddoups in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division:

The American public has a right to know what happened in Oklahoma City on the morning of April 19, 1995 and, more importantly, why?  Yet, it is obvious that for some reason FBI Defendants do not want the truth about the Oklahoma City bombing made public.  Perhaps the reason is as simple as: the Federal Government’s prior knowledge of that planned attack and failure to prevent it, or that there were others involved whom the Federal government chose not to expose and/or prosecute.  But whatever the reason, that is precisely why the FOIA became law: to protect the right of American citizens to know their own history and, more importantly, their government.  And that is why the Court should reject the FBI Defendants’ claim that their only obligation is to search their computerized records for this evidence knowing that it is not there and once that search they knew would fail has been concluded, they need do no more.

Also of interest were several documents Trentadue shared with me that shed light on the FBI’s response to his Freedom of Information Act request for the missing videotapes.

I continued to follow Trentadue’s efforts in several 2011 posts — on May 11, May 13, June 27, July 1, Sept. 9 — ending with one ‘Fast and Furious” post Oct. 10.

After almost a year passed, I picked up the trail again Sept. 11, 2012, publishing a piece under the headline, One-Hour Video Will Chill You.  It featured the video below.

On Oct. 21, 2012, I shared more details about Trentadue’s relentless pursuit of the truth about his brother’s death.  It was followed less than two months later by another not-so-dramatic update.

Things turned much more dramatic Jan. 30, when I shared details about Trentadue’s pursuit of information about the FBI’s “Sensitive Informant Program,” described by Trentadue as one used by the bureau “to recruit and/or place informants on the staffs of members of the United States Congress and perhaps even federal judges, in the national media, within other federal agencies as well as the White House, on defense teams in high-profile federal and/or state criminal prosecutions, inside state and local law enforcement agencies, and even among the clergy of organized religions.”

On March 1, 2013, I shared a follow-up piece about the FBI’s “Sensitive Informant Program,” using a headline to ask the question, Are FBI Informants Working Inside America’s Churches?

Eighteen years after the Oklahoma City Bombing, many questions persist and the truth remains elusive; therefore, I will strive to keep you updated on the case, in part, by following Trentadue as he pursues the truth about his brother’s death and, in turn, the Oklahoma City BombingStay tuned!

"Three Days In August" by Bob McCarty BobHeadshotSmall TCM Cover LR 4-10-13

Bob McCarty is the author of Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice, a nonfiction book that’s available in paperback and ebook via most online booksellers, including Amazon.com. It chronicles the life and wrongful conviction of Army Green Beret Sgt. 1st Class Kelly A. Stewart. His second book, THE CLAPPER MEMO, is coming soon.

Are FBI Informants Working Inside America’s Churches?

Jesse Trentadue’s ongoing effort to obtain information from the FBI continued this week when he filed a motion Wednesday aimed at convincing a federal judge in Utah to allow him access to information about the FBI’s “Sensitive Informant Program.  The move was made one month after the Salt Lake City attorney filed his first motion — the details of which appeared in a post Jan. 30 — seeking, among other things, to learn whether the FBI has informants working inside American churches.

Trentadue Motion for Limited Disc 2-27-13

Click to download motion (PDF).

Why is Trentadue seeking the information?  Because he believes it will lead him closer to the truth about the 1995 death of his brother, Kenneth Trentadue, under suspicious circumstances while in custody at the U.S. Bureau of Prisons Federal Transfer Center in Oklahoma City.

Below, I share the fascinating details of his most-recent motion (PDF).  Beginning with the “Background” which begins on page one of the document, the details contained in the document appear below, minus the footnotes contained in the actual document:

The FBI devotes a considerable portion of the Memorandum that it submitted in opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to arguing that this is a typical Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) case involving the adequacy of the FBI’s search for responsive documents and/or the applicability of the exemptions claimed by the FBI for not releasing the documents/records.  But this is not a typical FOIA case. Neither is it an isolated or stand alone case. This case, as the FBI well knows, is the latest front in Plaintiff’s long war with the Bureau to discover and uncover the truth about the Oklahoma City Bombing and a related matter: the murder of his brother, Kenneth Michael Trentadue.

Untold Stories of the OKC BombingThe first battle in this almost decade long FOIA war was fought before this very Court in Trentadue v. FBI, which revealed that persons other that Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols and Michael Fortier had participated in the Bombing. That first battle, and the documents/records that Plaintiff obtained as a result, also disclosed: (1) the existence of the FBI’s I-Drive and S-Drive computer systems wherein evidence related to the Bombing was kept hidden so as not to be subject to a FOIA request and/or not made part of the FBI’s official Bombing case file; (2) the CIA’s involvement in the Oklahoma City Bombing; (3) “Patriot Conspiracy” or “PATCON” that was a decade or more long FBI undercover operation designed to infiltrate and monitor or perhaps even incite various right-wing organizations; and (4) the existence of a surveillance camera videotape taken on the morning of April 19, 1995, which according to federal government documents purportedly shows not only the destruction of the Alfred P. Murrah Building, but also the persons who carried out that attack.  That first FOIA battle also disclosed the existence of the FBI’s “Sensitive Informant Program,” which is at the heart of this current FOIA discovery dispute.

The Sensitive Informant Program is the FBI’s disturbing practice of using private citizens as spies on the staffs of members of Congress and perhaps even federal judges, in the national media, within other federal agencies, on defense teams in high profile federal and/or state criminal prosecutions, inside state and local law enforcement agencies and even among the clergy of organized religions. The Sensitive Informant Program is designed to and does result in the circumvention of the protections guaranteed to American citizens by the Bill of Rights and the Separation of Powers Doctrine.

In response to Plaintiff’s FOIA request for the policies, rules, protocols and/or procedures governing the FBI’s recruitment and use of such informants in this secret surveillance program which spies on United States’ citizens on United States’ soil, the FBI produced 205 pages, which appear to be but a small portion of its: “Corporate Policy Directive” on the use of confidential human sources, “Confidential Human Source Validation Standards Manual,” “Confidential Human Source Policy Manual,” and “Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide” (collectively the “Manual”). Those portions of the Manual that the FBI actually provided to Plaintiff were heavily redacted. The FBI withheld all of these portions of the Manual on the basis of various exemptions from disclosure under FOIA.

It is Plaintiff’s belief, however, that NO exemption can be asserted to conceal this unconstitutional domestic spy/surveillance program. Simply put, FOIA, which has as its stated purpose the disclosure of the federal government’s wrongdoing, cannot and should not be used to shield the FBI’s unconstitutional actions undertaken on what appears to be a national scale. However, in order to properly frame and present to the Court his challenge to the FBI’s claims of exemption Plaintiff needs to conduct limited discovery into the scope and duration of this Sensitive Informant Program.

In the “Summary of the Argument,” beginning on page four of the motion, he presents the latest details:

Plaintiff’s need for this discovery is simple. If, for example, the FBI has never embedded a Sensitive Informant on the staff of a member of Congress and/or a federal judge, in the national media, within another federal agency, on the defense team in high profile federal and/or state criminal prosecution, inside of a state or local law enforcement agency or among the clergy of an organized religion, it will admittedly be difficult for Plaintiff to assert that NO FOIA exemptions should apply to those portions of the Manual being withheld from him. This is so because a rare or isolated violation of the Constitution by the use of Sensitive Informants may not be sufficient for the Court to override the FBI’s exemption claims.

However, if the FBI’s Sensitive Informant program has been in operation for years and/or involves the placement of many Sensitive Informants on the staffs of members of Congress and perhaps even federal judges, in the national media, within other federal agencies, on defense teams in high profile federal and/or state criminal prosecutions, inside state and local law enforcement agencies or among the clergy of organized religions, then it is obvious that the Manual is designed to and/or does result in the circumvention of the protections guaranteed to American citizens by the Bill of Rights and the Separation of Powers Doctrine. If this is so, then it is Plaintiff’s position that the FBI cannot lawfully assert any FOIA exemption to keep secret a clearly unconstitutional nationwide program of domestic spying.

The information that Plaintiff’s seeks by way of this discovery will also be necessary for the Court to determine whether the (b)(1) exemption claimed by the FBI applies. Exemption (b)(1) allows the FBI to exempt certain records provided it declares them “secret” on the basis of national security AND pursuant to an Executive Order allowing for that “secret” designation.

In order to obtain information with respect to the scope and duration of the FBI’s Sensitive Informant Program, Plaintiff has moved to conduct limited discovery consisting of just eleven (11) Interrogatories, the answers to which will document the unconstitutionality of the FBI’s Sensitive Informant Program, thereby allowing Plaintiff to challenge the FBI’s assertion of FOIA exemptions to conceal and/or withhold the Manual from Plaintiff and the American public, and the Court to determine the validity/applicability of those exemptions to the Manual. The FBI, however, vehemently opposes that Motion.

Of course, there is a lot more to the case, but Trentadue’s approach, summed up under the “ISSUE” section of the motion and shared below, seems brilliant to this non-lawyer:

The issue in this case is not the adequacy of the FBI’s search for the Manual. The FBI found the Manual. The issue for the Court to decide is (1) whether the FOIA exemptions advanced by the FBI for withholding portions of the Manual apply and (2), even if they do apply, can those exemptions be lawfully asserted to conceal FBI activities that clearly subvert the Constitution? Furthermore, this issue cannot and should not be decided without the discovery that Plaintiff is seeking to obtain through his Motion to Conduct Limited Discovery.

During an email exchange late Friday, Trentadue used layman’s terms to boil the matter down to one key issue.

“The FBI argues that the discovery (he) seeks would be futile since ‘illegal’ activity by the federal government is shielded from disclosure under FOIA if covered by an exemption,” he explained.

He went on to question how the FBI can, in good faith, claim that a national security exemption allows the Bureau to declare its unconstitutional domestic spying program “secret” and, in turn, allows them to keep their illegal activities hidden from the public.

“It is an absurd — no, arrogant — position for the FBI to take,” he said.

Stay tuned for details about how this case turns out.  Also, be sure to read earlier articles in my series, UNTOLD STORIES of the OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING.

"Three Days In August" by Bob McCarty BobHeadshotSmall NewBookCover LR 2-17-2013

Bob McCarty is the author of Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice, a nonfiction book that’s available in paperback and ebook via most online booksellers, including Amazon.com. His second book, THE CLAPPER MEMO, is coming soon.

Brother of Murder Victim Seeks Details of FBI’s ‘Sensitive Informant Program’

Salt Lake City attorney Jesse Trentadue filed a motion Monday asking a federal judge to determine whether he is entitled to limited discovery into the FBI’s “Sensitive Informant Program.”

Trentadue Motion for Discovery 1-28-13

Click to download copy of motion (pdf).

In his motion, Trentadue described the program as one used by the bureau “to recruit and/or place informants on the staffs of members of the United States Congress and perhaps even federal judges, in the national media, within other federal agencies as well as the White House, on defense teams in high-profile federal and/or state criminal prosecutions, inside state and local law enforcement agencies, and even among the clergy of organized religions.”

Trentadue’s interest in the program stems from questions that have surfaced during his ongoing investigation into the death of Kenneth Trentadue, his brother who died in 1995 under suspicious circumstances while in custody at the U.S. Bureau of Prisons Federal Transfer Center in Oklahoma City, months after the Oklahoma City Bombing.

Kenneth-Trentadue_Pic

Click to learn more at http://KennethTrentadue.com.

With his latest legal maneuver, Trentadue hopes to convince Judge Clark Waddoups to compel the FBI to provide all documentation outlining what he describes in the motion as an “unlawful and unconstitutional domestic spying program.”

The maneuver comes almost four weeks after the FBI answered a federal court complaint Trentadue filed under the Freedom of Information Act to obtain copies of the manual the FBI uses to recruit and place “sensitive informants.”  Citing national security concerns as the basis for their response, FBI officials answered that complaint by saying they “can neither confirm nor deny the allegations [of the Complaint] regarding its confidential informant program.”

Shown below, Trentadue’s definition of a “sensitive informant” is, perhaps, the most interesting aspect of his motion:

“…the term ‘Sensitive Informant’ is defined as anyone acting, directly or indirectly and with or without any compensation, on behalf of the FBI as a member of, person associated with or otherwise a participant in or observer of the activity or activities of an entity, organization, group, governmental agency or unit, association of organizations or individuals, public official, member of Congress, judge, cleric and/or religious or political organization AND who does not disclose or reveal to such entity, organization, group, governmental agency or unit, association of organizations or individuals, public official, member of Congress, judge, cleric and/or religious or political organization his or her FBI affiliation.

“A Sensitive Informant is, in other words, some one who is acting, directly or indirectly, on behalf of the FBI as an undisclosed participant in or observer of the activity or activities of an entity, organization, group, governmental agency or unit, association of organizations or individuals, public official, member of Congress, judge, cleric and/or religious or political organization.

“The term ‘Sensitive Informant’ likewise includes what the FBI’s current terminology refers to as a ‘Confidential Human Source’ including any and all sub-categories of Confidential Human Sources such as, but not limited to, what the FBI refers to as a ‘Privileged Confidential Human Source,’ who is someone reporting confidential information to the FBI in violation of a privilege such as an attorney reporting his client’s confidential communications, a physician reporting upon his patient’s medical or mental condition, a cleric informing on a member of his or her church or other religious organization, etc.

In his motion, Trentadue requested the judge order FBI officials to answer 11 critical questions about the scope of their “Sensitive Informant Program” prior to a yet-to-be-scheduled hearing during which, according to Trentadue, FBI officials have said they will file a motion for summary judgment to prevent him access to the information he seeks.

Looking only for numbers of Sensitive Informants and not for specific names from the FBI, Trentadue’s questions target the time frame, “since January 1, 1995.”  In short, he wants to know whether or not the agency has had Sensitive Informants inside a variety of government and non-governmental organizations.

Among the government organizations mentioned in his queries were the state and federal court systems, the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate, federal agencies other than the FBI, federal prosecutors’ offices, and law enforcement agencies at the municipal, county and state levels.

Among non-governmental agencies, he listed management positions inside news organizations, including but not limited to, the following:  Associated Press, ABC, CBS, CNN, FOX, MSNBC, NBC, NPR, PBS, Reuters or Scripps-Howard; Boston Globe, Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Miami Herald, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and/or Washington Post; The Daily Beast, Mother Jones, The New American, Newsweek, TIME and/or U.S. News & World Report.

Curiously, he also asked whether the FBI has had a Sensitive Informant(s) who was a cleric or member of the clergy in any religious organization.

Though I doubt the FBI will answer Trentadue’s questions, I’m convinced the attorney will continue fighting until he learns the whole truth about his brother’s death and, perhaps, about the Oklahoma City Bombing, too.

Untold Stories of the OKC Bombing

Click to read other posts in my series, “Untold Stories of the OKC Bombing.”

To appreciate the full scope and breadth of Trentadue’s latest effort, I suggest you read the motion.  It’s one of more than two-dozen posts I’ve published in my series, Untold Stories of the Oklahoma City Bombing.  Included in the series are more than a dozen posts about Trentadue’s pursuit of the truth.

If you don’t have time to peruse it all, simply read my Sept. 11, 2012, post, One-Hour Video Will Chill You, or watch the video below.

"Three Days In August" Promotional Photo

Click to order a copy in paperback or ebook.

Bob McCarty is the author of Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice, a nonfiction book that’s available in paperback and ebook via most online booksellers, including Amazon.com. His second book, The CLAPPER MEMO, is coming soon.

 

Murder Victim’s Brother Continues Fight Against FBI

In a post published Oct. 21, I shared details about a  24-page complaint filed by Jesse Trentadue in a Utah federal court days earlier.  Now, here’s an update:  On Jan. 10 at 3:30 p.m., Judge Clark Waddoups will rule on the Motion to Compel the FBI to produce the videotape taken by surveillance cameras at the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City the morning of April 19, 1995.

Untold Stories of the OKC BombingThe tape being sought by Trentadue, according to federal government records, “shows the Ryder truck pulling up to the Federal Building and then pausing (7-10 seconds) before resuming into a slot in front of the building. . . .[and] the truck detonation 3 minutes and 6 seconds after the suspects [plural] exited the truck.”

For some heretofore unexplained reason, the FBI doesn’t want to give up the tape, and Trentadue thinks their reluctance is connected to the death of his brotherr, Kenneth Trentadue, who died in 1995 under suspicious circumstances while in custody at the U.S. Bureau of Prisons Federal Transfer Center in Oklahoma City months after the Oklahoma City Bombing.

If Judge Waddoups rules in favor of Trentadue, Trentadue will find himself one step closer to getting to the bottom of the circumstances surrounding his brother’s death.  The Salt Lake City attorney, however, isn’t one to “count his chickens before they hatch” — and for good reason.

Despite being ordered by Judge Waddoups to search for and produce that tape, the FBI has essentially refused to do so.  Details about their stonewalling can be found in my July 1, 2012, post, FBI Official Says OKC Bombing Videotapes “Might Have Been Misfiled, Impossible to Know Where.”

RELATED NEWS:  Trentadue also gave me an update about his latest legal move made in an effort to convince the same federal judge to compel the FBI to provide all documentation outlining what he describes as the agency’s “practice/program to recruit and place informants in the national media; on staffs of Senators, Congressmen and perhaps even federal judges; on defense teams in high profile federal criminal prosecutions; in the clergy; in other federal agencies, including the White House; and in local law enforcement.”

Trentadue informed me that, today, the agency filed an answer to the federal court complaint he filed under the Freedom of Information Act, to obtain copies of the manual that the FBI uses to recruit and place informants known as “sensitive informants” serving on the staffs of federal judges, members of Congress and in national media outlets; among the clergy; in other federal agencies, including the White House; and even on defense teams in high-profile federal criminal prosecutions.  In their answer, the FBI states that it “can neither confirm nor deny the allegations [of the Complaint] regarding its confidential informant program” while citing national security as a basis for its refusal.

FBI Answer to Amendend Cmplt

Click to download FBI Answer to Complaint (pdf).

It’s a very interesting case the mainstream media isn’t following.  Rest assured, I’ll keep up with it.  Meanwhile, if you have a lot of time, be sure to read the 28 posts I’ve published in my series, Untold Stories of the Oklahoma City Bombing.  Including in the series are 14 posts about the Kenneth Trentadue Murder Case.

If you don’t have a lot of time, read my Sept. 11, 2012, post, One-Hour Video Will Chill You, or simply watch the video below.

"Three Days In August" Promotional PhotoBob McCarty is the author of Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice, a nonfiction book that’s available in paperback and ebook via most online booksellers, including Amazon.com. His second book, The CLAPPER MEMO, is coming soon.

 

Attorney Relentless in Pursuit of Truth About Brother’s Death

Since September 2009, I’ve written more than a dozen posts about Jesse Trentadue’s quest for answers about the death of his brother, Kenneth Trentadue, who died in 1995 under suspicious circumstances while in custody at the U.S. Bureau of Prisons Federal Transfer Center in Oklahoma City months after the Oklahoma City Bombing.  If there’s one thing I’ve learned about the Salt Lake City attorney along the way, it’s that he is relentless.

Today, less than seven weeks after sharing a chilling one-hour video of Jesse Trentadue speaking to an audience about his pursuit of truth, I share new details about a  24-page complaint he filed Thursday.

Via email Saturday afternoon, Trentadue told me his latest legal move was made in an effort to convince a federal court judge in Utah to compel the FBI to provide all documentation outlining what he describes as the agency’s “practice/program to recruit and place informants in the national media; on staffs of Senators, Congressmen and perhaps even federal judges; on defense teams in high profile federal criminal prosecutions; in the clergy; in other federal agencies, including the White House; and in local law enforcement.”  To date, the FBI has provided only a portion of the manuals.

Trentadue uncovered the existence of this secret surveillance program, according to the complaint, as the result of his related Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the FBI defendants to obtain a copy of the videotape taken on the morning of April 19, 1995, by external surveillance cameras mounted on the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in downtown Oklahoma City, which federal government records state recorded both the delivery of the bomb which destroyed the Murrah Building that morning and the perpetrators of that attack.

It will be interesting to see what, if any, tactics the FBI employs to keep the remaining documents out of Jesse Trentadue’s hands.

Stay tuned!

UPDATE 11/02/2012 at 7:55 p.m. Central:  I haven’t had time to write an update myself, so take a look at this one – The Good, The Fast, and The Furious.

Bob McCarty is the author of “Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice,” a nonfiction book that’s available in paperback and ebook via most online booksellers, including Amazon.com. His second book, “The CLAPPER MEMO,” is set for release this fall.

One-Hour Video Will Chill You

If you think Islamic terrorists are the only people Americans should be concerned about on this 11th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, think again.

If you think what you’ve heard about Operation Fast and Furious is about as bad as anything can get when it involves the U.S. Department of Justice, think again.

Beginning at the 4-minute mark of the video above, the story of one man’s investigation into the August 1995 murder of Kenneth Trentadue inside the U.S. Bureau of Prisons’ Federal Transfer Center in Oklahoma City will chill you to the bone.  The story is told by Trentadue’s brother, Salt Lake City attorney Jesse Trentadue.

After watching the video, please take time to share it.

FYI:  I also invite you to read some of the more than two-dozen pieces I’ve written about the Oklahoma City Bombing, a dozen of which either focus upon or mention the Kenneth Trentadue murder case.  Thanks in advance!

Bob McCarty’s first nonfiction book, “Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice,” is available in paperback and ebook via most online booksellers, including Amazon.com.  His second nonfiction book, “The CLAPPER MEMO,” is set for release this fall.

New OKC Bombing Documentary Released

A Noble Lie,  a new documentary film produced by Free Mind Films about the Oklahoma City Bombing, was recently released and, although I would dispute some of the claims and remain suspicious of some of the players involved, I can vouch for much of what is included in the 103-minute portion of the video I’ve watched.  After all, I’ve reported on the subject many times already.

Interesting to me is the appearance of Oklahoma City Police Officer Don Browning who, at the 9:19 mark of the video, talks about where he was the morning of April 19, 1995.  Browning is the same officer who, as I reported for the first time April 7, 2011, and again July 1, 2011, made a sworn declaration to the court that he and other non-federal rescuers were ordered to leave the Alfred P. Murrah Building soon after the bomb exploded despite the need to move quickly in hopes of locating and, hopefully, saving victims trapped by the blast.

Browning also appears several more times in the video and is joined by others, including Hoppy Heidelberg (see 25:15 mark), the one-time grand jury member who left a very-opinionated comment after reading the April 7, 2011 post, and Jesse Trentadue, the man who first appeared in the post, Video Raises New Doubts About Oklahoma City Bombing Evidence, Investigation, and appears in several other posts on this site.  Just type his last name in the search box to read them.  He makes his first appearance in the film (below) at around the 1:23:00 mark.

After watching the video, I remain convinced of two things:

First, that there is much more to the story of the Oklahoma City Bombing than some prominent Americans want their fellow citizens to know; and

Second, that Jayna Davis, the award-winning investigative reporter and author of the book, “The Third Terrorist: The Middle East Connection to the Oklahoma City Bombing,” remains the single best authority on the bombing.  To better understand how I reached this second conclusion, read the three-part series based on my interview of Davis that begins with the post, Best-Selling Author, Investigative Journalist Breaks Silence About OKC Bombing Video Tapes.

EDITOR’S NOTE (1/10/12 at 12:19 p.m. Central):  A day after publishing the post above, the 103-minute video that was at the heart of this post was removed by the folks who posted it on YouTube; therefore, I’ve added Trailer #1 and Trailer 2 below as a substitute.  As a result of these changes, some of the time mark references above are rendered meaningless when it comes to the trailers below.

Trailer #1

Trailer 2…

If you enjoy this blog and want to keep reading stories like the one above, show your support by using the “Support Bob” tool at right.  Follow me on Twitter @BloggingMachine.  Thanks in advance for your support!