Missouri Appeals Court Rules Against Floating Horse Teeth

Almost 18 months ago, I shared the news:   Floating Horse Teeth Goes on Trial in Missouri.  Admittedly one of the strangest headlines I’ve ever written, the story had to do with Brooke Gray’s desire to continue practicing her profession of caring for horse teeth (i.e., “floating horse teeth”) in the state of Missouri.  Yesterday, I learned from the folks at the Freedom Center of Missouri that Gray appears to have lost her right to practice her profession in the Show-Me State.

In early January 2012, the Clinton County Circuit Court in Plattsburg, Mo., ruled that it can and will enforce a state law that forbids any non-veterinarian to accept payment for providing basic animal husbandry services.  The judgment allowed Gray, a young woman with eight years’ training and experience at removing sharp enamel points from horses’ teeth, to continue assisting Missouri’s animal owners—but if she gets paid for her efforts, she will be fined and possibly sent to jail.  The Freedom Center of Missouri, which represents Gray, had argued that the U.S. and Missouri Constitutions protect a citizen’s right to earn a living providing basic animal husbandry services.

Now, fast forward to present.  According to the Center‘s Dave Roland, the Missouri’s Western District Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that the state can make it a criminal offense for non-veterinarians to provide basic animal husbandry services to Missouri’s livestock owners.

Noting that the Missouri Veterinary Medical Board had threatened criminal prosecution against a wide range of animal husbandry workers, including those engaged in such common, basic tasks as castrating or dehorning cattle, Roland explained, the court ruled the government may impose criminal penalties if these non-veterinarian workers are paid for their labor, despite long-recognized constitutional rights to earn a living in a common occupation and to enjoy the gains of one’s industry.

The decision came despite the fact that non-veterinarians have performed this task for hundreds of years in order to improve horses’ comfort and ability to perform for their owners.

“The court’s ruling effectively strips the right to enjoy the gains of your own industry clean out of the Missouri Constitution,” Roland said.  “What good is a constitutional right if the government can simply declare that it no longer applies?”

Gray was baffled by the court’s decision.

“I’m still trying to wrap my head around it,” she said.  “I’m helping horses and horse owners, not hurting them.  The court seemed to confirm that literally anyone is lawfully permitted to do this kind of work and that it is the sort of ‘industry’ addressed in the Missouri Constitution.  So why is it a criminal offense if a grateful horse owner pays me for doing that work?  It just doesn’t make sense.”

The appellate opinion also stated that while the work itself might be legal, it would be illegal for Gray to tell anyone else about her skills – despite the fact that this issue was not raised as part of the appeal.  The trial court had concluded that the government was not seeking to prevent Gray from sharing any information about her knowledge and ability, and the trial court expressly declined to include any such prohibition in its injunction.

“The U.S. Supreme Court has made abundantly clear that the government has no power to prevent citizens from sharing truthful information,” Roland explained.  “Brooke is very good at what she does and she has every right to tell other people about it, especially when the work that she’s talking about is perfectly legal.”

The Freedom Center of Missouri intends to seek further judicial review of Gray’s case.

“Missouri is home to thousands of workers who have for decades safely and affordably helped farmers and ranchers manage their livestock,” Roland said.  “Their services are essential to this state’s animal agriculture industry and both our state and federal constitutions guarantee these folks the right to get paid for their work.  We’re going to keep fighting to make sure that those constitutional guarantees have real meaning.”

"Three Days In August" Promotional PhotoBob McCarty is the author of Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice, a nonfiction book that’s available in paperback and ebook via most online booksellers, including Amazon.com. His second book, The CLAPPER MEMO, is coming soon.

Constitutional Rights Under Seige — Not Just Guns!

While many Americans are rightfully concerned about preserving their Constitutional right to bear arms, other vital Constitutional rights are being threatened.  Case in point:  A Chicago-area woman was arrested for merely videotaping her neighbor’s arrest!

When CBS2 Chicago reported the news earlier this week on their website, they used a slightly-inaccurate headline, Two Naperville Women Arrested for Trying to Block Smart Meters.  In reality, one of the women, Kim Bendis, was arrested for merely videotaping officers as they arrested the other women, neighbor Jenn Stahl, as she was arrested for trying to block utility workers from installing a controversial “smart meter” at her home.

This isn’t the first time a citizen has been arrested for exercising a First Amendment right.

Since May 27, 2011, when I published a post about photographers’ rights, I’ve shared news of two other arrests under similar, but not identical, circumstances.

In a post Aug. 24, 2011, I highlighted an event during which U.S. Rep. Steve Chabot, an Ohio Republican who somehow went on to win re-election, had police officers seize cameras from constituents attending one of his town hall meetings.  See video below:

One week later, I shared the incredible story of a Robinson, Ill., man facing up to 75 years in prison for filming police officers.  See video below:

If you’re a citizen journalist or simply someone who wants to gain a better understanding of his Constitutional rights, watch the video below and be sure to read about your rights.

"Three Days In August" by Bob McCartyBob McCarty is the author of Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice, a nonfiction book that’s available in paperback and ebook via most online booksellers, including Amazon.com. His second book, The CLAPPER MEMO, is coming soon.

Chicago Versus Afghanistan: Statistics Prove ‘Gun Control’ Doesn’t Make Americans Safer

Those calling for more restrictions on gun ownership in the United States need only compare Chicago to Afghanistan for proof that so-called “gun control” laws don’t make Americans safer.

Afghanistan Safe Than Chicago in 2012

 

According to a WBEZ.org report published Dec. 28, officials with the Chicago Police Department confirmed that Chicago had reached the 500-murders milestone with three days remaining in the calendar year.   Conversely, http://icasualties.org reported 309 American deaths in Afghanistan with two days to go in 2012.

Should we expect residents of Chicago, home to some of the strictest gun laws in the nation, to be moving to Afghanistan soon?  Of course not!  Thanks to the national news media’s anti-gun bias, most will never know that Chicago had 191 more killings than did the entire nation of Afghanistan.

SEE ALSO:  I shared a similar report three and a half years ago.

UPDATE 12/30/2012 at 6:42 p.m. Central:  More evidence of anti-gun bias seen in national news media’s failure to report on another Aurora, Colo.-style theater shooting that was thwarted by a good guy with a gun.

UPDATE 1/01/2013 AT 5:42 p.m. Central:  According to another source, Chicago tallied 532 murders during 2012.

"Three Days In August" Promotional PhotoBob McCarty is the author of Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice, a nonfiction book that’s available in paperback and ebook via most online booksellers, including Amazon.com. His second book, The CLAPPER MEMO, is coming soon.

Chilling Video Provides More Reasons to Vote for Mitt Romney

If you need another reason to vote for Mitt Romney Tuesday, watch “Rampant Injustice,” a chilling video about the dramatic rise of raids against small business owners by out-of-control federal government agencies during the first term of President Barack Obama.

See also:

• President Obama’s ‘Brownshirts’ May Be Closer to Smashing Down Your Front Door Than You Think

Politically-Motivated Raids Punish Gibson Guitar

Wood Prompts Feds to Raid Gibson Factories

Vote wisely, folks.  Your future depends on it!

Bob McCarty is the author of “Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice,” a nonfiction book that’s available in paperback and ebook via most online booksellers, including Amazon.com. His second book, “The CLAPPER MEMO,” is set for release this fall.

USDA Threatens Small Business Owner with $450,000 in Fines

Without much fanfare, Dean Moyer has raised gerbils and hamsters for 12 years.  He’s sold them to distributors who, in turn, have sold them to pet store owners across the country.  Chances are good that the pet hamster your neighbor’s kid always carries in his hand came from Moyer’s Sand Valley Farms, Inc.  But that could change soon if the folks at the USDA have their way.

“Basically, the USDA just wants me to close up,” Moyer said.  “They just want me to get out of the hamster business.”

During the week of July 15, Moyer received a “really thick registered letter” from officials at the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, the USDA’s investigative and enforcement services agency.  Inside the envelope was a “Settlement Agreement” dated two days earlier.  Under the boldfaced subhead, “Why You Are Receiving This Letter,” Moyer found an explanation that began this way:

We believe you violated the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. § 2131 et seq.) (AWA), as described in the attached Settlement Agreement.  our agency, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), is responsible for enforcing the AWA, and other agriculture laws that help prevent the spread of animal and plant pests and diseases, and ensure the welfare of animals.

After providing you with an opportunity for a hearing, we may impose civil penalties of up to $10,000, or other sanctions, for each violation described in this Settlement Agreement.  We are offering you the opportunity to resolve this matter by paying an amount that is much lower than the maximum civil penalty.”

The letter went on to list 45 alleged violations of the Animal Welfare Act dating back to Sept. 16, 2009.

Among other things, inspectors reported finding dead animals on the premises and a strong ammonia odor due to inadequate ventilation of the 10,000-square-foot facility.

Moyer explained, however, that anyone familiar with hamsters knows 50 dead animals among 6,000 live ones on the premises in a given week is neither unusual nor unheard of.  Similarly, he said hamster-savvy folks know the strong odor associated with hamster urine is virtually impossible to get rid of.

During a Monday afternoon phone conversation, Moyer shared his assessment of the dire situation he faces today as president of a 21-year-old family business headquartered at 83 Mouse Track Lane in Richfield, a community one hour north of Harrisburg in central Pennsylvania.

The conversation began with a humorous bent.

“Gerbils are very, very, very expensive right now if you want to buy any,” said Moyer.  “It’ll cost you $450,000 right now if you want a gerbil — I’ve got a fine to pay!”

The rest of the conversation was more serious and focused on the content of the USDA letter.

After answering the “why” question, USDA officials offered a description of how Moyer can waive his right to a hearing and pay a penalty — conveniently, no less, by check, money order or credit card — of $22,143 by Aug. 29.  It even offered a payment plan if he’s unable to fork over the entire amount in one lump sum.

Sarah L. Conant

Believing he has done nothing to warrant such fines, Moyer said he called a phone number on the signature-free letter a couple of days after receiving it and eventually connected with Sarah Conant, a USDA bureaucrat with a very long title — Chief, Animal Health and Welfare Enforcement Branch, Investigative and Enforcement Services.  If you recognize the name, it’s because I’ve written about Conant on more than one occasion.

Conant was the focus of my June 27, 2011, post, Animal Rights Activism Fuels USDA Rabbit Chase.  In addition, she earned noteworthy mentions in my Chasing Rabbits series which, among other things, chronicled John Dollarhite’s battle with overzealous federal regulators in tiny Nixa, Mo. [Hint: Family Facing $4 Million in Fines for Selling Bunnies is a good place to start.]  Finally, her agency figured prominently in my reports about Doug Terranova, a Dallas-based animal trainer who I described as caught up in a “legal circus” last summer.

Then unaware of Conant’s history as highlighted in the cases above, Moyer said he asked her what he could do to get the fine reduced and told her, “There’s no way I can afford a $22,000 fine.”

When Conant replied by telling him that $22,000 IS a reduced amount,” Moyer said he couldn’t believe what he was hearing and asked her, “What do you mean that’s a reduced amount?”

“She said, ‘We can fine you $10,000 per violation,’” he said, noting that the letter listed 45 violations — or $450,000 worth of violations.

Moyer said he literally begged her for mercy and, in turn, she said she would see what she could do.  Apparently, however, she couldn’t — or wouldn’t — do much.  Inspectors are scheduled to return to the business for another inspection Tuesday morning.

Rather than send the local inspector who is both familiar with Moyer’s operation and lives less than 20 miles away, the USDA will likely send inspectors from afar.

Moyer said his last inspection was conducted by two individuals, including one veterinarian, from Youngstown, Ohio.  In order to spend six hours inspecting his facility, they drove four and one-half hours each way and incurred meals, lodging and travel costs at taxpayers’ expense.  Apparently, the USDA has figured out that it’s easier for their inspectors to “lower the boom” on complete strangers.

The long and the short of this situation is this, according to Moyer:  “The way the regulations are written, it’s absolutely impossible for me not to get written up for a violation.”

If the fine isn’t dropped, Moyer’s entire livelihood stands at risk.  He has no other viable source of income to support his wife of 23 years and their four children, two boys and two girls who range in age from 8 to 17.  The income generated by the sale of rats and mice, his original business that began in 1991, simple isn’t enough.

“Potentially, this whole thing could put me out of business,” he said, explaining that he has nine employees dependent upon their jobs at Sand Valley Farms.

Moyer’s business won’t be the first shut down by the USDA.  He said the agency has put at least two other large hamster businesses (i.e., operations that raise 1,000 animals per week or more) out of business in recent years, leaving only three or four large firms in the entire United States.  In addition to those, only one- or two-dozen small raisers exist nationwide.

In addition to hosting inspectors tomorrow, Moyer said he’s also meeting to discuss his options with representatives of The Cavalry Group, a St. Louis-based group dedicated to fighting the radical animal rights agenda.

Bob McCarty is the author of “Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice,” a nonfiction book that’s available in paperback and ebook via most online booksellers, including Amazon.com.  His second book, “The CLAPPER MEMO,” is set for release this fall.

Gardening Against the Law in Backwards Missouri City

During World War I and World War II, it was considered one’s patriotic duty to plant a “victory garden” in order to reduce food costs.  Doing such a thing today, however, could result in one man having to pay a hefty fine or worse if officials in the backward city of Ferguson, Mo., get their way.

According to a news release from Dave Roland at the Freedom Center of Missouri, Karl Tricamo never imagined that it would be especially controversial when he decided to plant a garden in his yard in order to secure cheap, nutritious, organic produce for his family.  Just to be sure, however, he looked up all of the relevant ordinances in the city just north of St. Louis and confirmed that he would not be violating any laws.

Tricamo found that nothing in the ordinances prohibit citizens from growing healthy, organic produce on one’s property.  In fact, the city’s zoning ordinances specifically allow residents to cultivate community gardens and urban agricultural uses in residential areas.

Because he planted the garden in front of his house instead of behind it, Ferguson city officials soon began to pester Tricamo, going so far as suggesting that his garden was illegal.  Roland describes the chain of events that followed:

In March, shortly after he had tilled the garden in preparation for planting, the city sent a letter commanding that the yard be covered in straw and planted with grass seed – even though nothing in the city ordinances requires yards to be planted with grass or prohibits the planting of a garden on residential property.

Six weeks later city officials sent another letter demanding the removal of the vegetables from his yard because the property was not zoned for “agricultural” use, but of course the relevant section of Ferguson’s zoning ordinances explicitly allows gardens to be grown in residential areas.  Then the City sent Mr. Tricamo a notice (below) alleging a violation of Ferguson ordinance number 7-133 – but that ordinance addresses the structural elements of residential buildings such as foundations, walls, windows and doors, stairways, chimneys, gutters, roofs, and buildings’ exterior surfaces.  It says nothing about yards.

When Mr. Tricamo confronted the City about this violation notice, they rapidly backtracked and claimed that it had been sent by accident!  The City said he should disregard the notice, but have continued to insist that Tricamo’s garden is illegal.

Coincidentally, Tricamo’s troubles are taking place just down the road from the city of Hazelwood, Mo., where city officials took issue with two Girl Scouts trying to sell cookies in the driveway.  Coincidentally, the same lawyers who represented the city of Hazelwood against Caitlin and Abigail Mills are representing the city of Ferguson.

This situation illustrates a common practice among some city officials, writes Roland in the news release.  When all else fails in their attempt to control citizens’ behavior, they sometimes just make stuff up.

Learn more about the case here.

After reading about this case, be sure to order a copy of my book, “Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice.” It, too, will make your blood boil!

Domestic Drones ‘Red-Light Cameras on Steroids’

Though I’m all in favor of boosting national security, the prospect of surveillance drones spying on Americans makes me sick to my stomach.  I can only describe it as “red-light cameras on steroids.”

The video footage above shows what appears to be an unmanned aerial vehicle (a.k.a., “UAV” or “drone”) soaring across the sky above Elgin, Ill., about 40 miles west of Chicago.  One must assume it’s being used as a security measure in advance of the NATO Summit taking place in the “Windy City” Sunday and Monday.  And it could be the first step toward something more intrusive.  Something that follows the slippery-slope process so prevalent in American politics.

I suspect the first generation of drones flying above U.S. cities will be unarmed. It won’t take long, however, until someone — probably a member of Congress with a drone manufacturing plant and/or arms manufacturer in his district — steps forward and demands we take the next step and arm our domestic drones.  And this could be when the real battle begins.

Earlier this week on the Fox News Channel program, Special Report with Bret Baier, all-star panelist Charles Krauthammer predicted that the first American to shoot down a surveillance drone will attain instant “folk hero” status.

There comes a point when one must say, “Enough is enough!”

Check out my new book, Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice.  Read the reviews here.