Might More Firearms Have Helped in Kirkwood?

After watching a local television station’s interview of City Attorney John Hessel, I couldn’t help but think how he and other victims of Thursday night’s shooting tragedy in Kirkwood, Mo., might have fared better with the help of concealed firearms.

Makeshift Memorial Flowers in Kirkwood

Taking place both outside and inside the St. Louis suburb’s city council building, the senseless shootings by gunman Charles Lee “Cookie” Thornton left six people — including the shooter, three city officials and two city police officers — dead and two wounded.

Among the 30 or so gathered in the Kirkwood City Hall meeting room that night, only one trained and qualified person — Officer Tom Ballman — carried a firearm. Had only one other trained person carried a firearm into the meeting that night, the number of dead and wounded might have been greatly reduced. Surprisingly, Kirkwood city laws don’t entirely prevent it!

While Sec. 17-132 (a) of the Kirkwood municipal ordinances prevents ordinary citizens — including even those who’ve completed concealed-carry training and received permits to carry concealed firearms — from carrying concealed weapons into meetings of the Kirkwood City Council, it makes an exception for council members as follows:

…nothing in this subdivision shall preclude a member of the Kirkwood City Council, holding a valid concealed carry endorsement, from carrying a concealed firearm at a meeting of the City Council provided that it is not otherwise prohibited herein. Possession of a firearm in a vehicle on the premises shall not be a criminal offense so long as the firearm is not removed from the vehicle or brandished while the vehicle is on the premises.

* * *

Note: The piece above is not intended to serve as a criticism of any of the innocent victims, including Kirkwood city officials, who’ve suffered so much as a result of the shootings Thursday; rather, it’s intended to serve as an observation about the need to put firearms in the hands of trained, responsible and law-abiding citizens in keeping with the spirit of the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

* * *

To read other posts about the Kirkwood City Hall shootings, click here.

For other gun-related posts on this blog, click on one of the links below:

Video Shows Gun Rights Must Be Preserved

Expect Waiting Periods for Suicide Bomb Purchases

To learn more about concealed-carry laws and firearms training in Missouri, click here.

Second Amendment Must Stay, Despite Tragedy

I posted the following comment on the web site of the UK’s Daily Mail at the tail end of an article about today’s Virginia Tech shooting tragedy:

“I’m a frequent guest on BBC Radio’s World Have Your Say program and, on occasion, have heard contributors describe the States as a place where people begin using guns as early as five years of age. Nothing could be further from the truth, and I want people in the U.K. and elsewhere — including the USA — to refrain from characterizing the Virginia Tech tragedy as a reason to ban gun ownership in the States.

“Why? Because we have a saying in the States that the Second Amendment is critical to ensuring that the First Amendment remains in place.

“During the past several years, the majority of the 50 states have passed laws which allow individuals to carry concealed weapons. As a result, the rate of violent crimes in those states have dropped. You see, criminals aren’t so brave when they know their potential victims MIGHT be armed, too.”

If you have feedback for me, visit www.BobMcCarty.com.”

The same applies to you. Let me know what you think about the Second Amendment and the sure-to-surface call by liberals for a ban on gun ownership.