Communists Around the World Cheering Barack Obama

By Paul R. Hollrah, Guest Writer

Ronald Reagan brought down the Soviet Union during the 1980s by bankrupting the “evil empire,” forcing the Kremlin to try to compete with his “Star Wars” missile defense program.  They couldn’t keep pace in the arms race and the Soviet empire imploded.

Reagan vs. Obama

So, as we now find ourselves racing headlong toward the so-called “fiscal cliff,” is this payback time for international communism?  Is that what Barack Obama is all about?  I have never been much of a conspiracy theorist… I try as best I can to stick to what we actually know to be true… but I’m beginning to see the outlines of a major international conspiracy.  So humor me for a few moments, if you will.

In early 2008, when it looked as if Barack Obama might actually defeat the vaunted Clinton political machine, an article titled “The First Time I Heard of Barack” circulated on the Internet.  It was written by a man named Tom Fife who claimed to have made frequent trips to Moscow in the early 1990s, working on a software-development joint venture with Russian partners.

On a trip to Moscow in early 1992, he and several other Americans were invited to dine at the apartment of their Russian associate.  As he describes the evening, everything went well until late in the evening when their Russian partner’s wife, a hard core communist, launched into an anti-American tirade.  She said, “You Americans always like to think that you have the perfect government and your people are always so perfect.  Well then, why haven’t you had a woman president by now?  You had a chance to vote for a woman vice-president and you didn’t do it… Well, I think you are going to be surprised when you get a black president very soon.”

The Americans expressed the opinion that, yes, there was nothing to prevent a black man or a black woman from being elected president.  The right person, at the right time, could easily be elected.  To which the woman responded, “What if I told you that you will have a black president very soon and he will be a Communist?  Well, you will; and he will be a Communist.”

As her husband tried vainly to change the subject, one of the Americans said, “It sounds like you know something we don’t know.”

According to Fife, she replied, “Yes, it is true.  This is not some idle talk.  He is already born and he is educated and being groomed to be president right now.  You will be impressed to know that he has gone to the best schools of Presidents.  He is what you call ‘Ivy League.’  You don’t believe me, but he is real and I even know his name.  His name is Barack.  His mother is white and American and his father is black from Africa.  That’s right, a chocolate baby!  And he’s going to be your President.”

I tried several times to locate Tom Fife so that I could ask him to confirm or deny the story attributed to him, but with no success.  However, a four-part interview — Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4 — with Fife, by Jeff Rense, has recently surfaced:

Fast forward to the late ’80s or early ’90s, when Obama would have been in his late 20s.  Postman Allen Hulton regularly delivered mail to the home of Bill Ayers’ parents in Glen Ellyn, Ill., a Chicago suburb.  The Ayers family was quite proud that they had helped finance the education of a young black foreign student.  One day, Hulton met the young man, who he claims was Barack Obama, on the sidewalk in front of the Ayers home.  And when Hulton asked the young man about his plans for the future, he replied that he was going to be president of the United States.

Barack Obama Caricature by Political GraffitiFast forward once again some ten or twelve years when a young black Illinois state senator first emerged as a rising star in the Democratic Party.  On June 11, 2003, during the 108th Congress, Rep. Victor Snyder (D-AR) introduced House Joint Resolution 59, a proposal for a constitutional amendment to eliminate the “natural born Citizen” requirement of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution.  The Snyder proposal was followed by H.J.R. 67, introduced on Sept. 3, 2003, by Rep. John Conyers, a radical black Democrat from Michigan.  The Conyers amendment would have required only that presidents be U.S. citizens for 20 years, eliminating the “natural born” requirement.  Few members could see the need to amendment the Constitution.  Both proposals died in committee.

However, on July 27, 2004, an unknown young black man, Illinois state senator Barack Obama, delivered the keynote address at the Democratic National Convention, creating immediate speculation among Democrats that he might one day be a candidate for president.

Just over five months later, on Jan. 4, 2005, early in the 109th Congress, Representative Conyers made a second attempt with the introduction of H.J.R. 2, proposing the same language as contained in H.J.R. 67 of the 108th Congress.  And on April 14, 2005, Representative Snyder made yet another attempt, introducing H.J.R. 42, containing language identical to his H.J.R. 59 of the 108th Congress.

Since the “natural born Citizen” requirement of the U.S. Constitution had never before created a shortage of presidential candidates, why did the congressmen feel the need to overturn the desire of the Founders that all presidents must be “natural born” citizens?  Perhaps we should be asking them what they knew about Obama’s lack of eligibility, and when did they know it?

Barack Obama was elected to the United States Senate in November 2004 and was sworn in during the first week of January 2005.  Within weeks after taking the oath as a U.S. Senator, he launched into a campaign for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.

His principal opponent for the Democratic nomination was U.S. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY), but the powerful Clinton political machine was no match for the Chicago Democratic machine and on Aug. 27, 2008, a man with no real world experience… literally no experience of any kind… and who failed to meet the “natural born Citizen” requirement of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, was handed the Democratic presidential nomination.

However, as the convention drew to a close on Aug. 28, 2008, the chairman and secretary of the convention, Nancy Pelosi and Alice Travis Germond, respectively, had one final task to perform.  It was their job to prepare certifications for all fifty state election boards, officially certifying the names, home addresses, and constitutional eligibility of the party’s candidates.

The certification sent only to the State of Hawaii, pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes §11-113 which requires that all certifications must contain eligibility language, read as follows:  “THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though (sic) 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”

The remaining forty-nine states received the following certification:  “THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though (sic) 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:”

Affixed were the names and home addresses of Barack Obama and Joe Biden.  The documents were signed by Pelosi and Germond, chairman and secretary, respectively, of the 2008 Democratic National Convention, and notarized by Shalifa A. Williamson.

The phrase, “… and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution” was purposely omitted.  Other than that, all of the documents were absolutely identical… even to the misspelling of the word “through” in the second line of the certifications.

So when did Pelosi first learn that Barack Obama was ineligible to serve as president of the United States?  And who else was involved in the conspiracy to make him president?

And now, as the greatest nation in recorded history rushes headlong toward fiscal ruin, that same community organizer from Chicago who hoodwinked enough voters, or stole enough votes, to get himself elected to two terms in the White House, stands alone with the power to either save or to bring down our nation.

As he sits across the desk from Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), refusing to make real spending cuts and refusing to discuss entitlements reform, it is quite clear that he has no desire to prevent our country from plunging over the “fiscal cliff.”  Instead, as the committed communist he is, he would much prefer to see the capitalist system destroyed, and all of its adherents along with it.  In the dark crevices where communists gather around the world, they are drinking to his health and cheering him on.  This is known as “payback” time.  Am I wrong?

Paul R. Hollrah is a contributing editor for the National Writers Syndicate andthe New Media JournalHis blog is found at OrderOfEphors.comHe resides in the lakes region of northeast Oklahoma.  Click here to read more of Paul’s columns.

Be sure to pick up a copy of my first nonfiction book, “Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice.” and get ready for my second book, “The CLAPPER MEMO,” coming soon.

Obama Supporter Involved in Online Comment Controversy

A Barack Obama supporter in North Carolina admitted to me this afternoon that he wrote a now-controversial Facebook comment in which he stated that he had already voted four times and was planning to vote a fifth.  During the same conversation, however, he steadfastly denied having violated election laws or having plans to do so.

I became aware of the comment authored by someone named Jim Turner after a conservative blog with which I am not very familiar published a post featuring a captured image of the comment, the text of which appears below (minus names of the actual towns he named):

I have voted once in (name of town #1), once in (name of town #2), twice in  (name of town #3) and will vote in my precinct in (name of town #4), I will do whatever it takes to save our country from the world envisioned by Mitt and his fear mongering followers.  I do not want my granddaughter to have to re-fight the battles won by women 40 years ago or to make less than my grandson for performing the same work he does.  This election is not about taxing the wealthy.  It is about the American spirit and caring for our fellow man.  Let’s continue to move forward, not slip in the dark past.

Above the image was a link to the Facebook page of the Jim Turner alleged to be behind the comments.  When I visited that page, I found no evidence of the controversial  comment but did read a comment containing words that seemed to reference the controversial comment.  The words that appeared in the second comment are shown below:

“I posted a comment to Jami’s page earlier today and it now lives in cybersomewhere.  I can’t seem to get with the whole facebook thing.  I made bold comments on the future of my grandchildren under a Romney presidency and now it is gone.  I think my comments were deleted as part of a conspiracy inspired by some who see our national glass as half empty.”

When I looked for someone named Jami on the aforementioned Facebook page of Jim Turner in North Carolina, I found a “friend” by that name but nothing in the form of any recent, publicly-visible posts or comments by anyone named Jim Turner.

Still curious to learn more about this particular Jim Turner, I searched for him by name and city, careful to confirm that any address shown for him was also the address listed for his wife, a woman he describes in a section of his Facebook page as his “high school sweetheart.”  I was amazed at what turned up.

By clicking on one of the search results, I was lead to an Obama campaign website where I found this statement:  “Join us at the home of Jim and (wife’s name) Turner to make calls that will help re-elect President Obama.”  Below the statement was contact information(i.e., home address and phone number) for Jim Turner and his wife.

After I confirmed that the phone number shown matched one I had found on an online phone directory, I used it to try reaching Jim Turner.  After several tries today, I finally reached him at approximately 2:45 p.m. Central.

As stated above, the Jim Turner with whom I spoke admitted to writing the controversial comment but vehemently denied having actually voted more than once or having plans to do so.  When I changed the subject and asked if he and his wife have hosted any phone bank sessions for the Obama re-election effort, he politely ended our two-minute phone conversation without answering that question.

Editor’s Note:  Turner told me he has received death threats as a result of this controversy.  Because I do not condone death threats or harassment of any sort, I removed several links and other information from this piece so as to make it more difficult for anyone wishing to do harm to Turner to reach such an objective.

“BY HOOK OR BY CROOK” UPDATE 11/03/2012 at 7:36 p.m. Central:  NAACP operatives invade polling station in Houston.

“BY HOOK OR BY CROOK UPDATE 11/04/2012 at 8:16 a.m. Central:  538′s Nate Silver predicts Obama win.

UPDATE 11/04/2012 at 1:03 p.m. Central:  It appears that more than one news outlet has let the “genie” out of the bottle; therefore, I’m offering links to their stories here, here and here.  Note, my story is the only one that mentions the phone bank angle.

UPDATE 11/04/2012 at 9:17 p.m. Central:  So many conservative sites are sharing news about Jim Turner, but I remain the only one to share news about him hosting phone bank sessions for the Obama re-election campaign.  Now, I’ve added the photo above with Turner’s address and phone blocked out.

UPDATE:  Turner was cleared of wrongdoing, according to this report.

Bob McCarty is the author of “Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice,” a nonfiction book that’s available in paperback and ebook via most online booksellers, including His second book, “The CLAPPER MEMO,” is set for release this fall.

Dead People Receive Ballots in New Hampshire

Opportunities for election fraud that stem from prospective voters not having to show identification in order to obtain ballots are not limited to cities like Chicago and St. Louis.  Now, it seems “dead” people in every city and town in New Hampshire can play that game.

Yesterday, reporters from Project Veritas walked into several New Hampshire polling locations during the presidential primaries and, without being required to provide identification of any sort, used the names of dead people to obtain ballots for voting.  The video, Dead People Receive Ballots in New Hampshire (above), appears as Part One of the group’s latest investigative series.

In each case, the video shows reporters working for James O’Keefe‘s organization were able to state the name of a dead person — some who had been Republicans, others Democrats — obtained from obituaries that appeared in New Hampshire newspapers.  In almost every case, they were able to obtain a ballot for voting purposes soon after.

Wow!  Can’t wait to see Part Two.

The ‘Scoop’ On Barack Obama’s True Identity

By Paul R. Hollrah, Guest Blogger

Since the day that Barack Obama burst onto the national scene, there has been much speculation about his true identity… who and what he is and where he came from. These are odd questions to be asking about a mysterious man who sits in the White House, signing laws and appointing dangerous left-wing ideologues to the federal bench… his finger on the nuclear button.

One of the most interesting speculations about Obama centers on his Social Security number, 042-XX-XXXX, a number which, according to Social Security Administration procedure, was reserved for a card holder who resided in the State of Connecticut… a place Obama has never lived.

One report has the holder of the Obama SSN residing or working at the following Chicago addresses: 180 N. LaSalle Street, 5046 S. Greenwood Avenue, 5450 S. East View Park, 5429 S. Harper Avenue, 5324 S. Kimbark Avenue, and 7436 S. Euclid Avenue.   However, the holder of that SSN is also reported to have resided at 365 Broadway in Somerville, Mass., and 300 Massachusetts Ave. NW, in Washington, D.C.

If the Social Security number is, in fact, the number that Obama has used throughout his adult life, the associated addresses are all within reason. Obama spent a number of years in South Chicago working as a community rabble-rouser and later attended Harvard Law School in Cambridge, Mass., just south of Somerville.  He may also have rented an apartment at 300 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, in Washington, D.C., just blocks from the U.S. Capitol.

However, the mystery of Obama’s Social Security number took an interesting turn recently when Susan Daniels, a Cleveland, Ohio private investigator, discovered that the Social Security number in question was originally issued to a Connecticut resident who was born in 1890 and who applied for an Social Security number in or around March 1977.

Other investigators report that the Social Security number in question was issued to a man named Jean Paul Ludwig who was born in France Feb. 17, 1890 and who came to the U.S., via Ellis Island, Aug. 12, 1924. After arriving in the U.S., he was employed in Washington, D.C., by U.S. Sen. David Reed (R-Pa.), helping the senator translate his French language texts to English.  Other than those sketchy details, not much is known about Ludwig’s life except that he moved to Hawaii late in life and died in Honolulu, apparently intestate, in June 1981, at age 91.

Needless to say, in the absence of a complete and thorough investigation, this raises some very interesting, and very serious, questions. For example:

If a man named Ludwig arrived in the United States in 1924, at age 34, and lived all of his adult life in the United States, why did he wait until 1977, when he was 87 years old, to apply for a Social Security number?  And if Ludwig, or another 87-year-old person, was assigned the number 042-XX-XXXX in 1977, how did Obama manage to obtain the same number… given that the Social Security Administration never issues the same number to two people?

Allow me to engage in some unproven but highly-plausible speculation… speculation that Oliver Stone, who produced JFK and Nixon, might wish to turn into a movie titled, Obama.

In 1967, when Obama was just six years old, he and his mother moved from Honolulu to Jakarta with her second husband, Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia.  Upon arriving in Jakarta, it was time for Obama to be enrolled in school.  However, since the Indonesians did not recognize dual citizenship and required all students to be citizens of Indonesia, Obama was adopted by his stepfather… losing his U.S. citizenship and acquiring Indonesian citizenship in the process.

Then, in 1971 or 1972, when Obama was ten years old and his mother’s second marriage had failed, she returned him to Hawaii to live with his grandparents, Stanley and Madelyn Dunham.  It was there he completed his primary and secondary school education at an expensive private prep school, the Punahou School, in Honolulu.

Of course, that raises the question: since his grandparents were not wealthy, why did they not send him to a public school? Was he sent to Punahou, because public schools in Honolulu required documents such as birth certificates, passports, visas, and power of attorney signed by his mother… documents Obama may not have possessed… while entrance to Punahou, with scholarship assistance, was possible on the basis of competitive testing alone?

Then, during his teen years, sometime between 1977 and 1979, Obama wished to earn a bit of spending money or college money.  This presented the Dunhams with a bit of a dilemma.  The 16-year-old grandson who lived with them was no longer a U.S. citizen; he was a citizen of Indonesia and was not in possession of a valid U.S. passport or a Social Security number. They were aware that it was possible to purchase a bogus Social Security card off the “street,” but they hesitated to engage in that sort of illegal conduct.

Instead, as a vice president of the Bank of Hawaii, Obama’s grandmother had access to Social Security information on depositors and Honolulu residents that was not available to ordinary citizens. Sorting through bank records and the Social Security database, she found a new Social Security account belonging to an 87-year-old Honolulu resident, Jean Paul Ludwig, who had recently arrived in Hawaii and who had paid nothing into the Social Security System during his entire working career.  As such, he had no hope of ever receiving any form of Social Security benefits.

How could an 87-year-old man exist in the U.S. for more than 50 years without ever registering with the Social Security Administration? It’s easy.  As a French-English interpreter, he simply operated on a cash basis, without ever paying federal or state income taxes, and paying no F.I.C.A. taxes.  This made Ludwig the perfect target for identity theft because, even if he learned that someone else was using his Social Security number, there was not much he could do about it without exposing himself.  The criminal penalties and the tax liabilities he would incur made it highly unlikely that he would ever register a complaint.

If Ludwig died in Honolulu, intestate, in June 1981, and if his death was never reported to the Social Security Administration by family members seeking benefits, the Social Security account would have remained active. And once he was dead and gone, an identity thief had nothing more to fear about using the stolen Social Security number.  He would only have to be very careful to conceal his true identity for the rest of his life.  He could never put himself in a position where he might trigger an investigation into the details of his Social Security number.

So, when Obama went to work for Baskin-Robbins in Honolulu sometime between 1977 and 1979, he would have been required to enter a Social Security number on his job application. Did he apply for a Social Security card?  I would guess that he didn’t.  If he had no birth certificate, and if he was traveling either on a void American passport or a valid Indonesian passport, the complications of applying for reinstatement as a U.S. citizen were far too daunting.  I would speculate that when he filled out his Baskin-Robbins job application he simply pulled from his pocket the slip of paper that his grandmother had given him and copied the number 042-XX-XXXX into the appropriate box.

Donald Trump has said that his private investigators in Hawaii and elsewhere “can’t believe what they’re finding.” If they really want to earn their money they’ll do a bit of investigating at the Baskin-Robbins corporate headquarters in Canton, Massachusetts.  If they find that, at some time between 1977 and 1979, Baskin-Robbins employed an 88- or 89-year-old ice cream scooper named Barack Hussein Obama at one of their stores in Honolulu, then we will know for certain that the man who now resides in the White House is a felony identity thief… among other things.

And, if the Baskin-Robbins archives are complete, except for job applications from a single store in Honolulu covering the years 1977-79, then they will know that the Obama “scrubbing” team got there before them.

Admittedly, much of what I have written is speculation, but it is informed speculation that deserves further investigation.  What is not open to speculation is that Obama is using a Social Security number first assigned to a Connecticut resident in 1977… a man born in 1890.  Susan Daniels, P.I., has established that fact and I trust the work she has done, although she is now of the opinion that Obama had a different Social Security number as a teenager and only began using the stolen number during his college years.  Since the use of a Social Security number issued to another person equates to identity theft, it deserves to be investigated and prosecuted.

But who is to investigate and prosecute the crime?  The Republicans who control the House of Representatives tremble at the thought of impeaching Obama because he is a black man, while those in the Department of Justice with the responsibility for enforcing our laws work for Eric Holder, Obama’s Attorney General, the most corrupt man ever to serve in that office.

We are now just seventeen months away from the 2012 general election, so it is important that we all remember this: Friends don’t allow friends to drink and drive… nor do they allow them to vote Democratic.  Once Obama is out of the Oval Office, he must be arrested and prosecuted.

Paul R. Hollrah

Hollrah is a senior fellow at the Lincoln Heritage Institute and a contributing editor for Family Security Matters and a number of online publications.  He resides in northeast Oklahoma.

If you enjoy this blog and want to keep reading stories like the one above, show your support by using the “Support Bob” tool at right. Follow me on Twitter @BloggingMachine.  Thanks in advance for your support!

Should We Expect Election Fraud in St. Louis? (Update)

Two pieces of election news failed the “smell test” when they surfaced in Missouri today, and both tie directly to the Carnahan family, the liberal Democrat clan that spawned two 2010 candidates — Russ Carnahan, incumbent in the 3rd Congressional District, and his sister, Robin Carnahan, a candidate for the U.S. Senate.

The first item surfaced this afternoon when a caller to “The Dana Show” told host Dana Loesch that the St. Louis (Mo.) City Board of Elections was, on election day, using Special Services, a security firm said described as having a long-standing relationship with the same Carnahan family.

As shown on page 270 of a recent FEC report, Congressman Carnahan paid Special Services $1,400 to do security work for his campaign as recently as Aug. 26, 2010.  Only 66 days later, according to a news release issued by Russ Carnahan’s Republican challenger Ed Martin, the firm was hired by Eileen McCann, Democrat chairwoman of the St. Louis City Election Board, to do work on election day.

While this news alone cannot stand as an indictment of the election board chairwoman, the candidate or the security firm, it should prompt a thorough investigation.

The second item came into focus after Missouri Watchdog reported that the Show-Me State’s electronic database designed to track voter information was unavailable for poll workers to access online to verify voter registration on election day.

No one should find it strange that the high-tech approach to elections failed for a time on election day.  After all, the person charged with ensuring elections in Missouri are conducted in a smooth and fair manner is Robin Carnahan, the aforementioned senate candidate now serving as Missouri’s Secretary of State:

  • She was several points behind Roy Blunt, her Republican opponent, in almost every poll.  But I digress.

Again, a dysfunctional electronic database shouldn’t serve as an indictment of Robin Carnahan, but it too demands a bipartisan investigation.

At the end of the day, the “net-net” of today’s news is this:  No one in Missouri should be surprised to hear post-election news reports about shenanigans taking place during the election process in St. Louis and across the state.  It seems to be a way of life with the Carnahans.

UPDATE 11/3/10 at 10:30 a.m. Central: A Gateway Pundit report this morning features the text of an e-mail sent out by Ed Martin which backs up what I noted on my Facebook wall at around 11:30 p.m. Central Tuesday (i.e., “We also saw a mathematically implausible midnight surge of thousands of votes from a handful of precincts”).  See graphic below.

UPDATE 11/10/10 at 10:25 a.m. Central: Perhaps, I should have asked the question, “Should we expect election problems in St. Louis?”  Had I asked that, the answer would have been “yes” according to a new article published at Missouri Watchdog.  See Poll worker describes Election Day problems.

UPDATE 11/20/10 AT 9:21 a.m. Central: In an article today, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported, among other things, the following:

But e-mails obtained by the Post-Dispatch show that the chairman of the Election Board, a Democrat, hired the firm despite the objections of other board members, including a warning about the perception of a conflict of interest.

New Report Reveals Dead People Voting in Missouri

Earlier this week, I shared news that I surmised could derail Robin Carnahan’s U.S. Senate bid.  Today, I share an update from the Missouri Watchdog that was made public Thursday night.  Offered in the form of a question — Dead voters in Missouri? — it should prompt an investigation into the practices of the Democrat now serving as Missouri’s secretary of state.

Here’s a brief rundown of what reporter Earl Glynn found:

Missouri Watchdog extracted 3.1 million records from the Death Master File and compared them with the  4.1 million registered voters in Missouri.  A scoring system was used to track different kinds of matches and how “good” a match was considered.  The results show a potential list of 4,294 dead registered voters who could be removed once official verification has been established.


From the 4,294 potential dead registered voters a check was made between the death date and the date the last ballot was cast. This resulted in 281 potential “dead voters.”

Smells like election fraud to me.  Roy Blunt should make hay out of it.

To read the rest of the article, click here.

Great job, Watchdog!

Iran’s Post-Election Protests Growing in Intensity

Canada’s CBC News is reporting that shots have been fired in central Tehran as tens of thousands of Iranians continue to defy government orders by gathering downtown, hours after the country’s supreme leader ordered an investigation into allegations of fraud in the presidential election which saw President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (a.k.a., “PIRANHA“) declared the winner.  An unconfirmed report by an Iranian photographer claims that one protester has been shot dead.

EDITOR’S NOTE: ACORN has yet to be linked to the charges of election fraud in Iran.