CIA Director’s Resignation Raises Several Troubling Questions

The timing of CIA Director (Gen.) David Petraeus’ resignation Friday raises several troubling questions the American people deserve to have answered.

Gen. David Petraeus

Did the timing of General Petraeus’ resignation have something to do with the Nov. 6 election?

Knowing President Barack Obama‘s propensity to do anything to save his own hide, one has to believe it played a part in the saga.  According to a report by Ronald Kessler, it came months after the FBI began investigating his relationship with Paula Broadwell, the author of his biography, “All In,” and it left some FBI agents fuming.

Did it have something to do with the House Intelligence Committee’s upcoming hearing about the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya?

General Petraeus’ resignation came only days before he was — and, some say, still is — expected to testify Nov. 15 at a closed-door hearing during which members of the committee are expected to ask tough questions and demand truthful answers about the CIA‘s role in events before, during and after the attack which left Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others dead.  One has to believe it played a part as well.

Did it have anything to do with the fact that, by virtue of his position atop the CIA, he knew he would be subjected to periodic, in-depth polygraph examinations and face questions regarding, among other things, his personal conduct?

As a high-ranking government employee privy to classified information of the highest order, General Petraeus falls into the category of people who expected to be subjected to polygraph examinations on an annual basis.  As a retired Army four-star general with more than three decades in uniform, he also knows that a host of countermeasures are available to anyone wanting to defeat the polygraph; therefore, I doubt he had any concerns about undergoing such an examination.

Did it have anything to do with General Petraeus believing foreign intelligence agents might try to compromise him if they became aware of his clandestine activities with Mrs. Broadwell, the married mother of two is not his wife?

Well-schooled in all manner of intelligence-gathering operations, General Petraeus knows that foreign intelligence agents keep watchful eyes on people like him with the hope of finding information they might use in attempts to compromise him at some future date; therefore, I’m sure he limited his reckless behavior with his mistress to environments where none of the “bad guys” could catch him in the act.  Likewise, he probably trusted his extramarital lover.

Unfortunately, General Petraeus must have known he could not hide his affair from FBI agents able to install wiretaps and conduct surveillance activities not available to foreign agents.  In knowing those agents’ chain of command leads to Attorney General Eric Holder, the general also knew that the information would likely be seen by President Obama and held over his head as a bargaining chip of sorts for use at some point in the future when the president was in trouble and needed his CIA director to be his “fall guy.”

Understandably, General Petraeus decided he would rather face the wrath of his wife now than end up “under the bus” at some time in the future on trumped-up circumstances.

Though I don’t condone the general’s pre-resignation actions in any way and despise him for the role he’s played in shaping DoD’s severely-flawed “catch-and-release” policies which have turned many battlefields into untenable environments for warfighters, I can’t say I blame him from protecting himself from his boss.

Hopefully, the whole truth will come out during this week’s hearings and beyond.

Bob McCarty is the author of “Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice,” a nonfiction book that’s available in paperback and ebook via most online booksellers, including Amazon.com. His second book, “The CLAPPER MEMO,” is set for release this fall.

House Democrats Issue ‘Fast & Furious’ Report

Yesterday, led by Ranking Member Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.), Democrats on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee released a 95-page report on their investigation of Operation: Fast & Furious, the controversial gun-running operations that’s taken place during Attorney General Eric Holder’s watch at the Department of Justice.

Though I won’t go into many details about the smoke-and-mirrors report labeled “Fatally Flawed,” I will offer a quick look at the most-blatant evidence of denial in this report which appears on page 4 of the report’s Executive Summary:

No evidence that senior officials authorized gun-walking in Fast & Furious.

I will also point out the “Blame Bush” aspect of the report — that is, the subhead on the cover:  Five Years of Gunwalking in Arizona.

Take a look at the report and the conclusions reached therein.  If you believe the report accurate, please let me know, because I have some prime ocean-front property in Oklahoma that I’ve been wanting to sell for some time now.

Read the report via Scribd.

Rumor Mill: Eric Holder to Resign Friday

This tidbit came in this morning from a well-connected friend, and I wanted to put in on the record just in case it comes true:

Eric Holder

“Just heard from a little bird who lives with in the Washington D. C. beltway… Attorney General Holder is going to resign, perhaps by this Friday.”

Perhaps my last article about the “Fast & Furious” scandal, republished Dec. 3 by Andrew Breitbart at BigGovernment.com, pushed him to the brink.

Stay tuned!

If you enjoy this blog and want to keep reading stories like the one above, show your support by using the “Support Bob” tool at right. Follow me on Twitter @BloggingMachine. Thanks in advance for your support!

‘Fast & Furious’ Not Eric Holder’s First Controversy Involving the Murder of an American Citizen

While Eric Holder is getting a lot of media attention these days related to his involvement in the controversial ATF gun-running program known as Operation Fast and Furious, Salt Lake City attorney Jesse Trentadue said he “was way ahead of the curve” when it came to pointing out the attorney general’s many flaws — and skeletons.  He points to a scathing 4-page letter (PDF) he sent to Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) Dec. 19, 2008, as proof.

In the letter, Trentadue told the chair of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee the following:

Attorney General Eric Holder

You need to know that Eric Holder, now nominated to become Attorney General, played a key role in covering up the torture-murder of my brother, Kenneth Michael Trentadue.  You also need to know that Mr. Holder did this while serving as Deputy Attorney General and Acting Attorney General from 1997-2001.

This is not just my shocking opinion.  It is also the opinion of many Americans.  More importantly, it is supported by the Justice Department’s records and actions that came to light as a result of my family’s efforts to obtain a certain measure of justice for my brother’s murder.

Kenneth was killed in Oklahoma City in August of 1995.  My family has spent over 13 years investigating my brother’s gruesome murder, including bringing a wrongful death lawsuit in federal court in 1997.  In that case, the Justice Department hid and destroyed evidence that would have exposed my brother’s murders, and we believe that Mr. Holder was directly involved in those acts of obstruction of justice.

In a footnote appearing on page one of that letter, Trentadue noted the following:

Despite the destruction of evidence, the court awarded my family a $1 million judgment.  We have used that money to offer a $250,000 reward for the people who killed Kenney.  That offer is posted at:  www.kmtreward.com.  This site also contains the irrefutable evidence that my brother was murdered, which evidence was kept from us by the Justice Department.”

Trentadue’s letter continues:

To this day, however, despite the efforts of my family, numerous journalists, and Congress, the Justice Department has been able to hide this terrible story — and its culpability in the death of my brother Kenneth.  More importantly, then Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder was assigned to be the point man in blocking my family’s efforts to bring my brother Kenneth Trentadue’s murderers to justice.  Now, President-elect Barack Obama has nominated Eric Holder to be the new Attorney General.

The paper trail on Mr. Holder’s actions is scant.  However, e-mails and handwritten notes by those working under Mr. Holder in the Justice Department have surfaced.  These documents paint a clear picture of a wide-ranging and cynical scheme, run directly by Mr. Holder, to quash my family’s efforts to have my brother’s murder investigated, and to deflect congressional oversight and media attention from the shocking circumstances of his death.

According to these documents, a significant part of this plan involved Mr. Holder convincing Congress not to inquire into my brother’s murder.  The plan called for Mr. Holder to meet with Senator Hatch on October 9, 1997, just prior to the Justice Department’s issuance of a Press Release announcing that the federal grand jury supposedly “investigating” my brother’s murder had failed to charge anyone with this crime.

The stated purpose of this meeting between Mr. Holder and Senator Hatch was to defuse Judiciary Committee oversight and media inquiry into the circumstances of my brother’s death.  In fact, one e-mail states that “we ain’t looking for press on this.  Hill takes priority.”

But that meeting apparently did not go as planned by Mr. Holder, because the next day, October 10, 1997, Senator Hatch gave an exclusive interview to Fox News in which he spoke out against the results of the grand jury and the Justice Department’s handling of the case.

Rather than share Trentadue’s summary of what Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), told Fox News during the interview Oct. 10, 1997, I offer video (below) of the interview itself.

Did you catch that?  Senator Hatch said, “There’s a lot wrong with this case.” Not surprisingly, Jesse Trentadue agrees and points anyone willing to listen to the remaining content of his letter to Senator Leahy (PDF) before noting the following:

Fast & Furious is only the “tip of the iceberg”;

Two U.S. Border Patrol agents are dead;

The Oklahoma City Bombing is the “iceberg”; and

168 bombing victims, plus his brother Kenneth Trentadue, are dead.

For more information about Trentadue’s pursuit of justice, read “Operation Fast and Furious” Coverup Not Unique, my other reports about the Oklahoma City Bombing and visit Kenneth Trentadue.com.

UPDATE 12/03/11 at 1:03 p.m. Central:  Story picked up by Andrew Breitbart’s BigGovernment.com.

UPDATE 12/03/11 at 2:25 p.m. Central:  Trentedue tells me that the reward mentioned in his letter expired without anyone claiming it.   “That tells me that some very powerful people were involved in my brother’s murder and the cover up of that crime!” he said.

If you enjoy this blog and want to keep reading stories like the one above, show your support by using the “Support Bob” tool at right. Follow me on Twitter @BloggingMachine. Thanks in advance for your support!

Attorney General Eric Holder Must Go… To Mexico

By Paul R. Hollrah, Guest Blogger

Just eight words are proof enough that we can never again allow Democrats to run the United States Department of Justice.  Those words are:  Bill Clinton, Janet Reno, Barack Obama and Eric Holder.

Attorney General Eric Holder

During the month of February 1993, agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tax, and Firearms learned that the Branch Davidians, a religious sect located near Waco, Texas, had purchased 45 AR15 receivers for assault rifles… all legal firearms components.  However, under the suspicion that the Davidians might be using the receivers to manufacture illegal fully-automatic weapons, the BATF asked for and received a federal warrant to search the Davidian compound.

On April 17, after weeks of resistance by David Koresh and his followers, Attorney General Janet Reno approved a full-scale assault on the Davidian compound.  Her decision was affirmed by Bill Clinton on April 18 and the order was given.  Federal agents, in an 80 vehicle convoy, attacked the Davidian compound with armored vehicles, tear gas and scores of heavily armed agents.  Within minutes, the compound was fully engaged in flame and 76 residents, including 20 children and 2 pregnant women, perished in the flames.

Then, after eight years of the George W. Bush Administration, during which time the Department of Justice was ably and honorably administered by Attorney Generals Ashcroft, Gonzales, and Mukasey, the White House was occupied by Barack Obama and his team of Chicago-style thugs.  As attorney general, Obama chose Eric Holder, a Washington lawyer with a long history of legal administration colored by hyper-partisanship and political payoffs.

Holder’s criminal past goes back to December 1994 when he was United States Attorney for the District of Columbia.  In the aftermath of the failed Hillarycare debacle, several physicians filed suit against the Clinton Administration, charging that they were barred from participating in closed-door negotiations while pro-Hillarycare advocates were allowed in.

The White House staff member in charge of the Hillarycare negotiations was Hillary Clinton’s senior aide, Ira Magaziner, who claimed in a sworn affidavit that only federal government employees had participated in the White House meetings.  That sworn testimony was patently false, but when the Magaziner case was brought before U.S. Attorney Eric Holder he refused to prosecute  (Scooter Libby must be green with envy.)

However, until recent weeks, Holder’s most celebrated crime in support of Democratic hanky-panky occurred during the closing days of the Clinton Administration when pardons were sold to the highest bidder.  The most notorious of these were pardons for fugitive international financier Marc Rich, an FBI “ten-most-wanted” fugitive who’d been on the run from U.S. authorities for 18 years, and the 16 imprisoned members of the Puerto Rican terrorist group, FALN.

In the Rich case, then-Deputy Attorney General Holder advised Rich’s attorney, former White House Counsel Jack Quinn, to bypass normal procedures and send his pardon request directly to the White House.  Rich’s ex-wife, Denise, had given more than $1 million to the Democrat Party and to the Clinton Library and had visited Clinton on numerous occasions when Hillary was not in residence, so Clinton was more than anxious to be helpful.  Quinn did as Holder suggested and a telephone conversation was quickly arranged between Clinton and Holder.

In that conversation, Holder informed Clinton that, on the merits of the Rich pardon, he was “neutral, leaning toward favorable.”  It was all Clinton needed to hear.  The pardon, which Jimmy Carter characterized as “disgraceful” and “attributable to large gifts,” was granted.  In subsequent testimony before House and Senate hearings, Holder was as slippery as an eel.  He said, “I did not view (my interaction) as a recommendation, because I did not have the ability to look at all the materials that had been vetted through the way we normally vet materials.”

In other words, what Holder told the Congress was that Clinton could have obtained equally informed advice by consulting a person chosen at random from the Washington, D.C., telephone directory… someone who had never heard of Marc or Denise Rich.

The Rich pardon was preceded by an equally outrageous Clinton pardon.  On August 11, 1999, Clinton commuted the sentences of 16 members of the FALN, a violent Puerto Rican terrorist group that set off at least 130 bombs in the United States between 1974 and 1983, mostly in New York and Chicago.  The terrorists were convicted of conspiracy to commit robbery, bomb-making and sedition, as well as firearms and explosives violations, with prison terms ranging from 35 to 105 years.  In their terror attacks, they were responsible for no less than six deaths and the permanent maiming of dozens more, including law enforcement officers.

The commutation was opposed by the U.S. Attorney, the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons, a number of FALN victims and the Fraternal Order of Police.  However, following Holder’s appointment as Deputy Attorney General, he received a memo from three Puerto Rican members of Congress, Representatives Gutierrez, Velazquez, and Serrano, asking that he review the clemency request.  In July 1999, Holder ignored the opposition and recommended clemency for the terrorists.  Who benefited most from the commutations?  Hillary Rodham Clinton, who was campaigning for a seat in the U.S. Senate and needed the votes of the New York Puerto Rican community.

And now, as Attorney General of the United States, Eric Holder once again finds himself in the midst of a political firestorm… a firestorm that may ultimately make Teapot Dome, Abscam,  Travelgate, Filegate or any of the numerous Clinton scandals pale by comparison, a firestorm that Forbes Magazine suggests may ultimately become Obama’s Watergate.

In recent months, it has been learned that, sometime around September 2009, in a program called Operation Fast and Furious, BATF agents began pressuring Arizona gun stores to sell firearms to buyers whom the BATF thought would resell the guns to Mexican cartels, hoping to trace the guns to drug kingpins.  Since gun store owners cannot do business without a federal license, and since the BATF has the authority to shut down a gun store if the store’s paperwork is not in order or if the merchant is uncooperative, those requests were seen as more than simple requests.

As a result, gun store owners found themselves between a rock and a hard place.  The law requires them to report suspicious activity and to refuse to sell firearms to people they think may be breaking the law, yet BATF agents were telling them to sell firearms to suspicious-looking people who wanted to buy assault rifles by the dozens.  In fact, while BATF agents continued to apprehend gun smugglers transporting large numbers of weapons into Mexico, they were ordered by their superiors to let the smugglers pass.  Peter Forcelli, a BATF agent, told congressional investigators that, “We weren’t giving guns to people who were hunting bear.  We were giving guns to people who were killing other humans.”

What sets Operation Fast and Furious apart from previous political scandals is that no one was killed in Teapot Dome, Abscam, or Watergate, and only one person, Clinton confidante Vince Foster, lost his life during the many Clinton scandals.  Operation Fast and Furious has been directly linked to the murder of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, in Arizona and the killing of Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) Special Agent Jaime Zapata in the Mexican state of San Luis Potosi.  And although it is not known exactly how many Mexican nationals have lost their lives to Fast and Furious weapons, the Attorney General of Mexico has been able to tie at least 200 deaths to Fast and Furious weapons.  Only 600 of the 2500 smuggled weapons have been recovered, many at the scene of grisly murders.

In an appearance before the House Judiciary Committee on May 3, 2011, Holder testified that he could not recall the exact date on which he first learned of Operation Fast and Furious.  He said he’d “probably heard about Fast and Furious for the first time over the last few weeks.”

But now, documents have surfaced showing that Holder was made aware of the “gun walking” operation at least nine months earlier.  In a July 2010 memorandum, Michael Walther, Director of the National Drug Intelligence Center, told Holder that straw buyers in Operation Fast and Furious were “responsible for the purchase of 1,500 firearms that were then supplied to the Mexican drug trafficking cartels.”  This was followed by an October 18, 2010 memorandum from one of Holder’s chief deputies, Lanny Breuer, head of the DOJ Criminal Division, advising Holder that prosecutors were prepared to issue indictments in Operation Fast and Furious.

More than 40,000 people have died in that country’s bloody drug wars and Mexican government officials are furious.  They are demanding that those responsible for the smuggling of thousands of assault weapons into Mexico be extradited for trial in Mexican courts.

During the mid-1990s, when Holder served as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, he initiated a program called Operation Ceasefire, designed to reduce violent crime by getting guns out of the hands of criminals.  Now, it appears he has completely changed sides on the issue.  Having witnessed the damage that Barack Obama and Eric Holder have done to our great nation I can think of no greater justice than to see Holder extradited to Mexico… no greater pleasure than to stand at the border as he is led away in handcuffs and leg irons in the custody of the Mexican national police.

Paul R. Hollrah

Hollrah is a senior fellow at the Lincoln Heritage Institute and a contributing editor for Family Security Matters and a number of online publications.  He resides in northeast Oklahoma.

If you enjoy this blog and want to keep reading stories like the one above, show your support by using the “Support Bob” tool at right. Follow me on Twitter @BloggingMachine. Thanks in advance for your support!

American People Have Much Cause for Concern After FBI Given Unprecedented Police Powers

By Paul R. Hollrah, Guest Blogger

According to a June 12 article by Charlie Savage in The New York Times, “The Federal Bureau of Investigation is giving significant new powers to its roughly 14,000 agents, allowing them more leeway to search databases, go through household trash, or use surveillance teams to scrutinize the lives of people who have attracted their attention.

“The F.B.I. soon plans to issue a new edition of its manual, the Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide… The new rules add to several measures taken over the past decade to give agents more latitude as they search for signs of criminal or terrorist activity.”

According to the Times report, the FBI recently briefed several privacy advocates about the coming changes.  Among them, Michael German, a former FBI agent who is now a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, argued that it was unwise to further ease restrictions on agents’ power to use potentially intrusive techniques, especially if they lacked a firm reason to suspect someone of wrongdoing.

Mr. German is quoted as saying that, “Claiming additional authorities to investigate people only further raises the potential for abuse, pointing to complaints about the bureau’s surveillance of domestic political advocacy groups and mosques and to an inspector general’s findings in 2007 that the F.B.I. had frequently misused ‘national security letters’ which allow agents to obtain information like phone records without a court order.”

Valerie E. Caproni, the FBI general counsel, is quoted as saying that the bureau had fixed the problems with the national security letters and had taken steps to make sure they would not recur.  She also said the bureau, which does not need permission to alter its manual so long as the rules fit within broad guidelines issued by the attorney general (emphasis added), had carefully weighed the risks and the benefits of each change…

As the Times reports, some of the most notable changes apply to the lowest category of investigations, called an “assessment.”  The category, created in December 2008, allows agents to look into people and organizations ‘proactively’ and without firm evidence for suspecting criminal or terrorist activity.”

Photo Courtesy Chesapeake Energy

As an employee of a major oil company, I was once assigned as a member of a six-man team of engineers — one member from each of six companies — whose job it was to prepare preliminary design, cost estimates, and economic justification for the construction of a major large-diameter products pipeline from Gulf Coast refineries to the Upper Midwest… a project then described as the world’s largest privately-financed construction project.  If constructed, the 300,000 barrel/day pipeline would carry refined products… gasoline, diesel fuel, home heating oil, and jet fuel… from refineries in Texas and Oklahoma to major terminals in Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Illinois and Indiana.  From those terminals, petroleum products would be distributed to a dozen other states.

Because it was necessary to approximate the daily throughput through the pipeline for purposes of determining the size (diameter) of the pipeline, each of the six companies involved in the study was required to nominate input volumes for each refined product at each of their refinery locations along the proposed route.  And since it would have been a violation of federal anti-trust laws for the companies to exchange actual sales volumes for the various markets, and since the throughput estimated by each company would ultimately determine each company’s share of capital investment and ownership, all of the throughput volumes nominated by each of the companies were a carefully calculated fiction… large enough to insure that the line capacity would be sufficient to handle market growth for the foreseeable future, but not so large as to make the initial cost of the system uneconomic.

Prior to being assigned to the six-man task force, I had participated in friendly penny-ante poker games on perhaps a dozen occasions.  I had never before been involved in a multi-billion dollar poker game, which is essentially what we were doing as representatives of our respective companies.

As the project proceeded and the first iteration of the study was finalized, each of the task force members returned to their companies to develop their respective IRRs (Internal Rate of Return), allowing each of the companies to assess their relative position in the project.  And when each of the companies had reassessed their strategies… increasing or decreasing projected volumes so as to increase or decrease their share of the required investment… the task force was reconvened for the second iteration.

As this process was repeated through at least three iterations in ground floor offices in a building in downtown Tulsa, Okla., we were tipped off by the janitorial staff that men in suits and ties were collecting our waste paper each evening. It didn’t take long for us to figure out that it was either the FBI or lawyers from the U.S. Attorney’s office who were collecting and studying our discarded waste paper, trying to find evidence of anti-trust violations.

Even though our internal controls and practices were designed to avoid any possibility of illegal or anti-competitive information sharing, to the outsider… or to the FBI… what we were doing may have “appeared” to be anti-competitive.  So, in an effort to escape the prying eyes of federal agents, we were provided with office space in what appeared to be an old brick school building or county courthouse in Independence, a small town in southeastern Kansas. It was in that building that we completed our final iteration of the joint venture… the iteration which was finally adopted by the six company coalition.

On the day that we completed our work and each member of the task force was given two complete Xerox copies of the final study, I drove south on U.S. Route 75 through Bartlesville, Okla., and south from there to our corporate offices in Tulsa.

As I reentered my office for the first time in many weeks, dropped my briefcase, a box of files and my two copies of the final study onto my desk, I barely had time to remove my suit jacket before two FBI agents entered my office with subpoena in hand. They had apparently followed me all the way from Independence, Kan.

I spent nearly a week making Xerox copies of an entire file cabinet of project files… most of it reams of handwritten calculations that would have meaning to no one but me… before turning it all over to lawyers for the Department of Justice.  When teams of lawyers had combed through the six sets of files and found no evidence of anti-trust activity, the project was given a clean bill of health by the Department of Justice.

But that was 45 years ago, in an era when Justice Department lawyers and the FBI needed the approval of senior-level appointees in the Department of Justice to engage in warrantless searches.  The far less restrictive investigative powers announced by the FBI on June 12, 2011, require no such senior level approval.

 

 

And while the Bush Administration made good use of the Patriot Act in fighting the War on Terror, much to the displeasure of the radical left, it is when leftist regimes find themselves in control of borderline law enforcement tools that enforcement tends to overlap into the realm of domestic political activity and freedom of expression is jeopardized. It was true of Nazi Party rule in Germany during the 1930s and ‘40s, it was true of successive totalitarian regimes in Soviet Russia during most of the 20th century, and it is just as true in the early 21st century as the Obama regime engages in politically expedient enforcement of the law.

Since leftist regimes can always be expected to ignore caution signals or stop signs as they move briskly across the line to violate the civil rights of law abiding citizens, the American people would be well advised to keep a wary eye on Obama’s political police.  If we can’t expect the Obama regime to prosecute members of the New Black Panther Party for intimidating voters outside a Philadelphia polling place, when acts of intimidation were caught on video tape, and if the Obama regime can simply ignore a federal court order requiring the Interior Department to lift an illegal ban on oil and gas exploration in the Gulf of Mexico, then what laws can we expect them to enforce… or not enforce?

With Barack Obama and Eric Holder in charge of enforcing our laws, and with the FBI given unprecedented police powers of search and seizure, the American people have much cause for concern.

Paul R. Hollrah

Hollrah is a senior fellow at the Lincoln Heritage Institute and a contributing editor for Family Security Matters and a number of online publications.  He resides in northeast Oklahoma.

If you enjoy this blog and want to keep reading stories like the one above, show your support by using the “Support Bob” tool at right. Follow me on Twitter @BloggingMachine. Thanks in advance for your support!

Holder Blames Congress Before Announcing Plan to Hold Military Tribunals for 9/11 Terror Suspects

Eric Holder

Only after claiming Congressional interference played a pivotal role in his decision, Attorney General Eric Holder announced today he will use military tribunals to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and several other alleged 9/11 terrorists.

AG Holder’s decision comes barely two years after President Barack Obama’s Jan. 22, 2009, announcement that he would close the Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility within 12 months, prompting the “Free at Last” cartoon below which appeared in a post the following day.  More importantly, it comes after the nation’s top law enforcement officer said that he still believes that the federal court system is an appropriate venue for the Justice Department to achieve swift, fair justice for 9/11 victims and family members.

The attorney general’s decision came almost four months after a Rasmussen Reports telephone survey showed 84 percent of likely U.S. voters were at least somewhat concerned that dangerous terrorists will be set free if the prison camp is closed and some prisoners are transferred to other countries. That included 57 percent who were “very concerned.”

Unfortunately, the decision today stands to bring to an end the seemingly-endless opportunities — including the “GITMO Detainee Reentry Academy” radio parody above — to criticize the Obama Administration and the for its handling of GITMO detainees.

I am, however, very willing to sacrifice such opportunities in exchange for 9/11 victims and their families finally obtaining justice.

If you enjoy this blog and want to keep reading stories like the one above, show your support by using the “Support Bob” tool at right. Thanks in advance for your support!