Questions Surround FBI’s Use of Century-Old Polygraph

This morning, I read an article by McClatchy News reporter Marisa Taylor. Published in the Raleigh, N.C., News-Observer, its polygraph-focused content seems to contradict what an FBI supervisory special agent told members of a subcommittee of the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary about the polygraph in 1997.

NewsObserver FBI Poly Applicants LR 5-20-13

Click image to read NewsObserver article.

Taylor reported the nation’s top law enforcement agency has been turning down applicants because they fail their polygraph tests. Such moves fly in the face of testimony offered by FBI Supervisory Special Agent (Dr.) Drew Campbell Richardson.

In a piece I published one week ago, I highlighted Richardson’s description of polygraph screening as “completely without any theoretical foundation and has absolutely no validity.”

TCM Richardson Story LR 5-13-13

Click image to read article.

Am I surprised by what Taylor uncovered or that the FBI continues to rely on often-criticized century-old technology? No.

After all, I spent much of the past four years learning about the polygraph and those loyal to it who, for more than 40 years, have waged a “turf war” against any and all challengers to their domain as the federal government’s credibility assessment technology of choice.

Unlike the wars that have been fought in Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam and elsewhere since the early 1970s, this turf war I uncovered has been fought overseas and at home.

Most recently, it has contributed to hundreds of American and coalition casualties in Afghanistan in so-called “Green-on-Blue” or “Insider” attacks — that is, when so-called Afghan allies turn upon their foreign colleagues, often with deadly impact.

For details about this turf war, order a copy of my recently-released second nonfiction book, THE CLAPPER MEMO. It’s available in paperback and ebook versions from Amazon.

"Three Days In August" by Bob McCarty BobHeadshotSmall TCM Cover LR 4-10-13

Bob McCarty’s first nonfiction book, Three Days In August, is also available in ebook and paperback at Amazon.

THE CLAPPER MEMO #3 — Amazon’s ‘Top 100 Hot New Releases in Terrorism’

The Kindle version of THE CLAPPER MEMO continues to climb the charts, now showing up in the #3 spot in Amazon’s “Top 100 Hot New Releases in Terrorism.”

TCM Amazon Hot New Rel Terror LR 2013-05-15 at 10.57Thanks to everyone who’s helping get the word out about this book which, by the way, comes highly recommended.

THE CLAPPER MEMO is available in paperback and ebook versions from Amazon.

"Three Days In August" by Bob McCarty BobHeadshotSmall TCM Cover LR 4-10-13

  Bob McCarty’s first nonfiction book, Three Days In August, is also available in ebook and paperback at Amazon.

THE CLAPPER MEMO Climbs Into Top 100 New Releases in Politics

Good news! The Kindle version of my recently-released second nonfiction book, THE CLAPPER MEMO, is now listed at #33 #17 #10 among Amazon.com’s Top 100 Hot New Releases in Politics.

TCM Amazon HNR Pol LR 5-16-13 While three strong endorsements are helping the book garner serious attention, the true story contained inside this book sells itself.

THE CLAPPER MEMO is available in paperback and ebook versions from Amazon.

"Three Days In August" by Bob McCarty BobHeadshotSmall TCM Cover LR 4-10-13

Bob McCarty’s first nonfiction book, Three Days In August, is also available in ebook and paperback at Amazon.

Someone Doesn’t Want Me to Publish This Book?

A fellow nonfiction author, whose name I will not share for security reasons, tackles subjects that certain elements within the federal government consider “taboo.” Kinda like me. Almost four years ago, she warned me about what had happened to her — while working on a book that went on to become a New York Times best seller, that is — and said it might happen to me. Now, it seems, maybe she was right.

NewBookCover LR 2-17-2013Only four days after I revealed the new cover design for my second nonfiction book, THE CLAPPER MEMO, both of the word processing programs I use to write my manuscripts crashed and would not reopen.

It’s not as if I didn’t pay attention to my fellow author’s warning. In fact, I made it a point to disconnect my computer from the internet every time I was working on my manuscript. Well, almost every time. Dang it!

What is it in my next book that some would rather not see made public? Some hints:

• In THE CLAPPER MEMO, I’ll share details of a 40-year technological turf war involving many players. Inside the Pentagon. At some of the nation’s top universities. In places like Afghanistan, Iraq, Guantanamo Bay and Mexico. And in local and state police jurisdictions across the United States.

• In THE CLAPPER MEMO, I’ll share never-before-published documents and insider details obtained from the very people who interrogated detainees at Guantanamo Bay and from the very people who interrogated members of Saddam Hussein’s “Deck of Cards.”

• In THE CLAPPER MEMO, I’ll connect the dots between three memos — including one signed in 2007 by James R. Clapper Jr. — and the “Green-on-Blue” attacks (a.k.a., “insider attacks”) by so-called “allies” in Afghanistan against their U.S. and coalition colleagues.

• After four years of work on THE CLAPPER MEMO, I found all roads lead back to the technological turf war and to the memo signed by Clapper — then serving as Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence, now serving as Director of National Intelligence, our nation’s highest intelligence official.

Do I have any evidence that my system has been infiltrated? No. According to some in the military and intelligence communities who’ve assisted me in gathering information that will appear in THE CLAPPER MEMO, it’s unlikely I’ll ever find any.

Thankfully, I do have backup copies of my manuscript and other computers on which to work.

"Three Days In August" Promotional PhotoWhile you wait for the release of THE CLAPPER MEMO, be sure to read my first nonfiction book, Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice. It’s available in paperback and ebook via most online booksellers, including Amazon.com.

‘Green-on-Blue’ Attacks Prompt Changes in Afghanistan

Following another “green-on-blue” attack Tuesday that left five U.S. troops in Afghanistan wounded, an International Security Assistance Force spokesman was quick to put an official “spin” on the incident. At the same time, however, he revealed that ISAF officials recently changed their approach and are now getting more involved in efforts to stop these attacks.

Click on image to read about my three-months-long effort to obtain a copy of an unclassified handbook, “Inside the Wire Threats – Afghanistan,” from the U.S. Army.

Lt. Cmdr. Brian Badura, according to a Stars and Stripes newspaper article today, said that the number of attacks against U.S. and NATO troops by members of the Afghan National Security Force is low relative to the number of Afghan troops and police working with ISAF forces. That’s the spin. Evidence of a change of approach in combating the attacks appeared in the article’s fifth paragraph:

“First and foremost, ISAF is getting together with our Afghan National Security Partners on the vetting and process they use,” he said, adding, “What we’re trying to do is make sure that any of the mitigation does not damage the trust we’ve built between the (Afghan National Security Forces) and coalition units.”

When asked via email April 4 about the process via which ANSF members were being vetted prior to working alongside U.S. and NATO forces, LTC Jimmie E. Cummings told me the following:

“ISAF or U.S. are not responsible for vetting Afghans for either the Afghan National Army or Police. The Afghans use a 8-step process in vetting their candidates.”

An ISAF public affairs officer, Colonel Cummings went on to refer me and my questions about the ANSF vetting process to Sediq Sediqqi, a spokesperson for the Afghan Ministry of Interior. Unfortunately, Sediqqi acknowledged receipt of my questions via email but has yet to reply with answers despite repeated followup attempts. As a result, I’m forced to rely upon a NATO Media Backgrounder, dated March 2011, for details of the ANSF vetting process. Highlighting ANSF’s eight-step vetting process, an excerpt from that paper appears below:

Recruitment is now following an 8-step vetting process. Upon signing the enlistment contract agreement, the recruit must get two individuals (village elder, Mullah, or other local government representative) to sign and vouch for the recruit. These individuals are held responsible if any discrepancy in the contract is found. The recruit’s paperwork and government ID is reviewed and basic biometric information (retinal scan, fingerprints, height, age, and weight) is collected, added to the recruit’s personnel file and accompanies the recruit to training. The biometric data is then checked to see if the individual has any known criminal or insurgent links. Approximately 6% of applicants are screened out for either drug use or medical conditions.

NewBookCover LR 2-17-2013In a country where record keeping can be described as “suspect” at best and where corruption runs rampant, it’s no surprise that ANSF’s approach to date has done little to prevent the green-on-blue attacks.

In my soon-to-be-published second nonfiction book, The CLAPPER MEMO, I’ll expose never-before-published details of my investigation into the “green-on-blue” attacks and other matters related to the interrogation technologies now being used — and, in some cases, not used — by U.S. military and intelligence officials in world hotspots for things such as vetting detainees, enemy combatants and third-country nationals.

The product of more than three years of painstaking investigation, dozens of interviews and a whole lot of Freedom of Information Act requests, The CLAPPER MEMO goes so far as to connect the dots between a single memo signed by James R. Clapper Jr., the man now serving as our nation’s top intelligence official, and the green-on-blue deaths of dozens of Americans in Afghanistan since that memo was issued.

UPDATE 7/5/12 at 9:48 a.m. Central: Via email yesterday, Colonel Cummings denied that anything has changed in the way ISAF is handling it’s advisory role in Afghanistan.

* * *

While you await the release of The CLAPPER MEMO, be sure to order a copy of my first nonfiction book, Three Days In August: A U.S. Army Special Forces Soldier’s Fight For Military Justice.  It, too, will make your blood boil! Thanks in advance!

Subscribe to the feed for this site.